Created on

5

/

4

/

2025

,

19

:

24

Updated on

3

/

18

/

2026

,

5

:

43

Between the Red Leaves and the White Bones

1925–1936: The Metamorphosis from Romantic Rebel to Master of Fate

Preface: history nerd alert.


Notes for Non-Chinese Readers

This essay includes references to historical, political, and ideological contexts specific to 20th-century China. Below is a brief explanation of key terms:

  • Orange Isle Head (橘子洲头): A narrow island in the Xiang River in Changsha, Hunan. Known for its scenic beauty and political symbolism, it was where a young Mao Zedong wrote Qinyuanchun · Changsha in 1925.

  • Changsha (长沙): The capital of Hunan Province in southern China. It was Mao’s hometown and an early center of intellectual and revolutionary activity during the May Fourth and early Communist periods.

  • Beiyang Warlords (北洋军阀): Military factions that controlled northern China after the fall of the Qing dynasty (1912–1928). The Beiyang government was nominally national but fragmented by warlordism and personal rivalries.

  • Land Revolution (土地革命): A radical policy promoted by the Chinese Communist Party beginning in 1927. It involved confiscating land from landlords and redistributing it to peasants, often accompanied by class-based violence and public denunciations.

  • Wang Jingwei (汪精卫): A senior Kuomintang (KMT) politician who initially supported leftist alliances and cooperation with the Communist Party. Later defected to the Japanese during WWII, leading a collaborationist regime in Nanjing. His name has since become synonymous with “traitor” in Chinese discourse.

  • Long March (长征): A yearlong military retreat (1934–1936) by the Red Army to escape Nationalist encirclement. Of roughly 80,000 who began, fewer than 10,000 completed the journey. It became a foundational myth in Communist Party history.

  • Great Chinese Famine / “Three Years of Natural Disasters” (大饥荒 / 三年自然灾害): A mass famine from 1959 to 1961, caused not by nature but by the policy failures of the Great Leap Forward. Estimated to have caused between 15 and 45 million deaths.

  • Great Leap Forward (大跃进): A campaign launched in 1958 by Mao Zedong to rapidly industrialize China. It emphasized backyard steel production and collectivized agriculture, leading to widespread economic collapse and famine.

  • Rustication / “Up to the Mountains and Down to the Countryside” (上山下乡): A state-mandated movement during the Cultural Revolution that sent millions of urban youth to rural areas to perform manual labor. It disrupted education, careers, and family life for an entire generation.

  • One-Child Policy (计划生育): A population control policy implemented from 1979 to 2015. While it slowed demographic growth, it also led to forced abortions, gender imbalances, and deep generational trauma.

  • Whampoa Military Academy (黄埔军校): A military academy founded in 1924 near Guangzhou by Sun Yat-sen with Soviet support, intended to train officers for the National Revolutionary Army. It played a crucial role in the rise of both the Kuomintang (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Key figures like Chiang Kai-shek (its first commandant) and Zhou Enlai were among its early members. The academy symbolized the brief period of KMT–CCP cooperation during the First United Front

  • April 12 Incident / 1927 Purge (四一二事件): A violent anti-Communist crackdown launched by Chiang Kai-shek on April 12, 1927, in Shanghai. With the support of military forces and local gangsters, hundreds (some say thousands) of Communist Party members, labor unionists, and leftist sympathizers were arrested and executed within days. The purge marked the official collapse of the First United Front between the KMT and the CCP and initiated a period of civil war and political repression.

  • Autumn Harvest Uprising (秋收起义): An armed insurrection led by Mao Zedong in September 1927 in Hunan and Jiangxi provinces. It was one of the Communist Party’s earliest attempts at rural-based revolution following the April 12 purge. The uprising failed militarily, but Mao retreated to the Jinggang Mountains and began developing the strategy of rural guerrilla warfare and peasant mobilization that would later define the CCP’s path to power.

  • Northern Expedition (北伐): A military campaign launched by the Nationalist Kuomintang (KMT) from 1926 to 1928 to unify China by defeating the Beiyang warlords. Led by Chiang Kai-shek and supported by the Chinese Communist Party under the First United Front, the campaign aimed to end regional fragmentation and bring the country under centralized rule. While initially successful, tensions between the KMT and CCP escalated during the campaign, leading to the April 12 Incident and the eventual outbreak of civil war.


1) 沁园春·长沙

独立寒秋,湘江北去,橘子洲头。
看万山红遍,层林尽染;漫江碧透,百舸争流。
鹰击长空,鱼翔浅底,万类霜天竞自由。
怅寥廓,问苍茫大地,谁主沉浮?
携来百侣曾游,忆往昔峥嵘岁月稠。
恰同学少年,风华正茂;书生意气,挥斥方遒。
指点江山,激扬文字,粪土当年万户侯。
曾记否,到中流击水,浪遏飞舟?

这首词写于1925年,毛泽东31岁时,长沙、橘子洲头。此时,毛泽东刚从广州返回湖南长沙,在湖南省立第一师范学校担任国民党湖南省党部主事。1924–1927 是第一次国共合作时期,即中国共产党与国民党为了“联俄、联共、扶助农工”共同对抗北洋军阀,实现国家统一的一段短暂合作。1924年,共产党的规模还非常小、非常弱,据说只有千人级别,力量远不能推翻北洋军阀,顶多算个小支队。当时据说苏联建议中国共产党采取“党内合作”的方式,让共产党以个人身份加入国民党,在国民党内部进行合作和渗透,推动左派政治。共产党的目标是推翻封建制度、反资本主义、建立无产阶级政权,主张土地革命、社会主义、苏联式组织模式。而国民党初期,中间偏右,汪精卫支持与中共合作、倾向苏联援助、支持一定的土地改革和劳工政策;而蒋介石排斥共产党,强调民族主义、军权集中,但又怕共产党动员“农民造反”,破坏社会秩序,更依赖军队、商人、地主阶层。事实证明,蒋介石担忧的全都发生了。而共产党最后也夺取军权,到现在也牢牢控制土地、军队,和时不时打击商业。说是反右,但自己最后也夺去了所有右派的权,获得了所有所谓的“右权”。

毛泽东的文笔不错。那时候的橘子洲头,确实想他说的这样,往岸边看,确实可以枫叶红遍山,各类鸟鱼飞游,场景肃杀清冷;不像现在挤满游客。读完通篇,可以感觉到他当时的迷茫。虽然“指点江山”,满怀抱负,但也不确定谁可以主沉浮。他都31岁未满32了,和我现在的年龄刚好一般大,还想主导历史沉浮。而这问题对我来说没含义:没人可以主导历史的沉浮,大家都是时间长河里的必然。他这种行为,在我看来,有过大的看重个人的选择给结果带来的影响的意思。不管所有人怎么选,结果都一样。不是某人、某事件、某物在主天地沉浮,是所有的事件一起、堆积起了必然。不管是共产党也好、国民党也好,梁启超也好、戊戌变法也好。不管是什么方式,需要暂时放弃一些旧的、已经不适应当时社会的行为规范、社会交流模式,取尝试一些新的、可以带动社会发展的结构。


2) 错误

长征、饥荒、大跃进、文革、上山下乡、计划生育不属于这个范围。任何的改革,如果到了牺牲两三千万人的性命作为代价了,相关事件的发起人都应该再考虑、不然就是草菅人命。这些事件任何一件,单拎出来,都是和平时代的巨大灾难。我问chatgpt,中国历史上是否有和这些事件能相提并论的灾难,它回答说,极少,并且帮我列举了具体数字。长征发生于1934年到1926年,八万红军最后存活下来不到一万。八分之一的生存率。而大跃进和三年饥荒,一共加起来大概死亡1500至4500万人。文化大革命造成的直接死亡大概一百万到两百万人,但实际“非正常死亡”人数更高。上山下乡,死亡人数不详,但牺牲代价极高。计划生育,“非正常死亡”数据无法统计,堕胎和女婴被杀害大量存在。在我出生之前,我也曾有过一位被流产掉的姐姐。因为计划生育,我差点也没能站在这里给你写这篇文章,想到这里,毛骨悚然。我非得问chatgpt,具体有哪些事件可以比肩这些事件的伤亡人数。它说,14世纪,元朝中期的“丁口户税改革”,以此带来的瘟疫、强制迁徙也曾造成大量“色目人”与汉人被强制调遣、贬为“贱籍”。大量人口迁徙去漠北、岭南等地区,导致死亡广泛发生。chatgpt评价为,结构性暴政,和种族、身份歧视性管理。还有北宋,王安石“青苗法”局部实行,导致农民大量破产和暴毙,虽然是非主观屠杀,但因为政策理想主义、脱离现实,导致民生惨重。某些地区因强制贷款,和暴力催收而大幅人口锐减。

1959年,中国的人口大概为6.6亿。如果按照三千万人死亡,相当于每22人个人中死去一位。纳粹大屠杀大概死亡了六百万犹太人,而苏联大清洗和乌克兰饥荒,大概死亡了一千万到一千五百万人。按照三年是1095天算,三年饥荒,则是每天平均死亡快三万人,也就是每天有一个县城的人口被活活饿死。而我之前查到的,我妈出生那年,她的村里才一万多人。这直接造成了大量农村直接断代,也就是一整个generation的人直接死亡。全村人饿死,仅剩极少数老人、小孩,他们丧失生育能力或者没有生育条件。兄弟姐妹互吃、父母弃婴、老人自绝不是夸张,是真实存在的事件。存活着失语,像我妈一样不再主动讲述上一代。后代甚至改姓、逃亡,断绝原身份。我才知道,我这代的人家里如果还有族谱也是种privilege,说明你祖上完美避开了所有这些人间惨剧。当时,河南、安徽、四川也是重灾区。这些省本来是农业大省、人口大省,却因为生产任务极端虚高,动不动就要“亩产万斤”,导致粮食被统统上交国家,地方无粮。中央强制征粮,不顾生死,即使颗粒无收也要完成“征购任务”,口粮也被拉走。原本人口稠密,一旦缺粮,死亡就是按照百万计发生。同时,当时还修“户口墙”,不准“粮民”掏出乡村。很多人饿死在村里,不得动弹。在安徽,尤其以凤阳、宿县为重,死亡率极高,部分地区超过60%。有近40万人口的农村,最后只剩下10万人。有村庄整村小时,地图上今天还能看到“无主空村”的痕迹。很多人口耳相传,“饿到吃土、啃树皮、吃人尸体”。

其中“信阳事件”,是三年大饥荒时期最早、最严重、也最被研究者关注的地方性灾难之一,饿死人数在百万到三百万之间,有乡镇全村饿死或只存一两人。当地干部竞相“争红旗”,虚报亩产数万斤,但实际上收成极差。为了按照报上去的产量上交粮食,老板姓连种子粮、口粮都被拉走。而地方干部怕“饿死暴露问题”,下令封锁村庄、阻止逃荒。《墓碑》(杨继绳)详细记录了信阳事件,是目前最系统的资料来源之一。《圣殿:1959–1961信阳大饥荒沉思录》、《信阳事件:一个沉痛的历史教训》、《痛忆“信阳事件”全程》、《“信阳事件”的历史、社会根源及经验教训》也有大量幸存者回忆。据说,内部文件曾称信阳“是一次严重的政策执行灾难,应引以为戒”,但无官员被真正追责。


3) 沁园春·雪

北国风光,千里冰封,万里雪飘。
望长城内外,惟余莽莽;大河上下,顿失滔滔。
山舞银蛇,原驰蜡象,欲与天公试比高。
须晴日,看红装素裹,分外妖娆。
江山如此多娇,引无数英雄竞折腰。
惜秦皇汉武,略输文采;唐宗宋祖,稍逊风骚。
一代天骄,成吉思汗,只识弯弓射大雕。
俱往矣,数风流人物,还看今朝。

从上次写沁园春长沙,又过去了11年。这时候毛泽东大概42岁了。十一年过去,他从一个在湘江边写词的青年,变成了一个开始在雪地上评点帝王的历史构建者。他不再感慨“谁主沉浮”,而是直接说:“还看今朝。”这一“看”,是掌控,是支配,是宣言。清朝末期,清政府签订了很多条约,要把铁路等重要国家产业卖给外国,四川、湖北等地爆发保路运动。同时,南方革命党人、如孙中山早已秘密筹划武装起义。武昌新军中有大量同盟会成员,在气氛高涨之下,决定提前发动起义。1911年10月10日晚,新军工程营首先起义,占领武昌城。随即成立了“湖北军政府”,宣布脱离清廷、建立中华民国。起义成功循序激励全国各省:四川、湖南、遇难、广东、福建,纷纷宣布独立。两个月内,十四个省宣布脱离清廷控制。当时清政府惊慌失措,紧急召回在外的“北洋大臣”袁世凯,也就是实际军权掌握者,回来镇压起义。但当时局势已经失控,北洋军战斗力强,但不想为清廷卖命。于是1912年,孙中山任刚成立的南京临时政府大总统,提出“民族、民权、民生”三民主义。但为了避免内战,孙中山决定compromise,让位给袁世凯,条件是溥仪退位。记住孙中山这个决定。这个决定标志清朝灭亡,中国两千年的君主制结束。虽然推翻了清朝,但中国并未统一。袁世凯为北洋政府,以北京为中心,控制名义上的政权。但刚刚也说了十四个省都脱离清廷宣布独立了,他们不认袁世凯。而且北洋政府离南方较远,也无能为力。中央管不到地方地头蛇。这时,孙中山又来了,在广州成立国民政府,誓言北伐。他成立黄埔军校,这个时候蒋介石从军校崛起了。国民党也开始接受苏联援助,与中共开始第一次合作,毛泽东写下了沁园春长沙。他正苟在国民党里,正在等待时机。

1926年,国名党开始北伐,蒋介石是总司令。北伐了大半年,从夏天发到到冬天,节节胜利,工农运动高涨,共产党力量上升。中共开始没收土地、动员罢工、攻击旧有权威;同时号召工人、农民反抗地主、资本家,并且主张工人农民组织直接管理地方政权。对国民党来说,他们“动员太过激进”,已经“威胁到了社会秩序“,出现想夺权的苗头。据chatgpt说,毛泽东在湖南农民运动中推行激进政策,激怒当地地主阶级。工人罢工影响城市经济,引起国民党右派和商人阶层强烈不满。这我可以理解,毕竟打仗的是国民党,共产党当时可能顶多算外联。外联给联出这么大事,我要是蒋介石,我也不合作了。但大屠杀这种事,我也做不出。后来蒋介石就发动了“四一二政变”,联合军警和上海黑帮,一夜之间大批共产党员、工会成员、左派被屠杀。几天内死亡人数上千,全国左派震惊。共产党转入地下和农村,开启武装斗争。毛泽东尝试以武装起义应对,发动秋收起义,但失败。那是他第一次指挥武装暴动。他被党内批评为“机会主义”,逐步被边缘化。他意识到城市暴动不可持续,那是蒋介石的地盘,他认识军警和黑帮。毛泽东转向农村游击战。1927年,共产党大概有五万党员。政变之后,锐减至一万人到一万五左右。


4) 北伐时期的国民党湖南省党部 代理宣传部长

我好奇毛先生在国民党的时候,具体是负责什么的,果不其然,是宣传部部长、虽然是代理的。这应该是他饭碗里的工作,他会读书、会写诗、会写文章,在宣传“新思想”方面很有煽动能力,也让很多知识分子觉得自己深深地被理解。宣传部长,用现在的话说,就是负责propaghanda的。我想我身体里也有他的一些基因,我这么会,原来也是跟老人们学的。在这之前,毛先生在湖南已经是地方活跃分子。他1920年创办文化书社,在长沙五一路的一个二层小楼里。现在五一路也还是老城区的市中心,虽然这栋楼已经不在,但可以想象到当时的繁荣。这个文化社,对外叫文化社,但实际上,对内是革命组织的据点。我记得在很久之前看的《十月围城》里,有展现靠出版社当掩护、实际是革命据点的操作在当时非常普遍,共产党、兴中会都这么干。文化书社通过销售《新青年》《共产党宣言》《马克思传》《社会主义史》等书,传播马克思思想、民主思想、反军阀思潮。他写传单、标语、小册子,开讲座,搞“平民夜校”,教工人、贫民读书识字。这是极好的事情,except我不确定毛先生是真的想他们识字、可以做出自己的判断,还是为了方便他煽动革命。我很怀疑毛先生的所谓“觉醒”是否是真的觉醒。看起来,只是给自己推翻强权的理由,目的还是自己掌握权利。毕竟掌权之前的约定,在新中国成立之后,没有兑现,还在“实践中”造成比军阀更糟糕的影响。

很多北洋军阀是安徽人,当时的湖南的权利掌握者张敬尧也不例外,是袁世凯旧部、北洋军阀重的“皖系军阀”。就好像现在党内也很多派系,之前也一样。他早期在清朝陆军中任职,后来投靠“皖系”首领段祺瑞,1918年被任命为“湖南督军”,也就是军区司令和地方最高行政长官,军权、政权一体。虽然张敬尧的统治时间才两年,但因为在当地反复收税、重复征粮,在本地臭名昭著。他任命亲信当地方官僚,控制湖南全境,镇压学生运动、罢工罢课,不惜开抢。嗜酒如命,公开霸占女学生。对外软弱,屈从日本人对湖南的经济掠夺,对内却把地方当私人资产、横镇暴敛。毛先生想要推翻他,他开始了“驱张运动”。毛先生手上没抢,他知道自己的资本是话语权、青年人和社会影响力。他开始动员学生、工人、商人、教师,开始撰写并且散发大量反张文章、小册子、传单,列出“驱张六罪”:贪污纳贿、压榨民众、镇压学生、出卖民族利益、对付妇女侮辱、暂居湖南不肯撤军。这些情况到现在、也还存在,只是不同人、不同地方、不同方式。毛先生的宣传资料,是在讲道理,但也在制造愤怒,提供合法性框架。他说这人不好,那你得说说,你具体有什么操作办法?怎么操作?打算怎么做?你把你的计划拿出来,给全民公投啊。怎么还是你说了算,还是“自上而下”。

我想这就是为什么每次发动什么“革命”、什么“运动”,他总是需要给自己找合理性。他觉得这样,就使自己不同。革命如果不是大家自发的、自然而然的产生的,战争的、强制的、暴力的形式,恐怕不你多么宏大的理由,都给你以为帮助的人没有起到多大帮助。这点我最近深有感悟。他有他的思想,我有我的思想,别人有别人的思想。管你什么思想、一人一句,一起商量。“自上而下”,甚至“间接选举”,“议会制度”都不是直接民主。这些“间接民主”,wiggle room还挺大。现在各种系统这么rigged,很多问题解决不了。你要说某些人没占着茅坑不拉屎,我有点难以相信。这放在全世界都一样,不针对具体国家。毛先生在北伐时期,是以共产党的身份在国民党湖南省党部,任代理宣传部长。他获得这个职位,是因为1923年时,孙中山提出“联俄、联共、扶助农工”,开始国共合作。苏联推动中共党员以“个人身份加入国民党”,国民党为了加强基层动员,也接受中共人才在地方党部任职。当时中央政府已经完全失能,北洋军阀袁世凯控制北京,各地军阀割据、老百性苦不堪言。孙中山在广州搞“护法运动”,但几次北伐都失败,根本打不过北洋军队。国民党,缺兵、缺钱、缺地盘,党内分裂严重,面对北洋军阀、外国列强只能采取联合共产党、俄国和扶助农工的方式,强大自己。

1917年,苏联刚成立,想输出革命、需要在东方找盟友。西方列强都排斥孙中山,认为他是反秩序的激进分子。苏联主动接触国民党,提供军事顾问、训练支持、资金援助。孙中山打算借助共产党带动基层,但有国民党掌权,这也是第一次国共合作的基础。毛先生利用自己在第一师范的影响力,组织长沙各高校联合罢课、游行、情愿,成立“长沙学生联合会”,拉动全省响应。不仅如此,他还拉拢湖南商会、工商界,组织“罢市”,制造地方经济压力。他的群众路线,不是只靠穷人,而是借矛盾统一的不同阶层的利益诉求。他将湖南民众的清泉材料、驱张文宣送到北京,借《民国日报》等进步报纸传播湖南现状,施压北洋政府。当时,北洋内部 “皖系”、直系正在内斗,毛先生知道张敬尧是“皖系”,搞臭他正好方便中央撤他的职。看到这里,我深刻理解到毛先生体内的反动基因,他的组织能力、宣传能力、带动能力、制造混乱的能力都很强。这到底是为什么?是湘人的本能吗?我正在深刻反省。


5) 驱赶军阀

“驱张运动”发生在1920年夏,从张敬尧1918年被北洋政府任命为湖南督军,不过两年时间。毛泽东此时还没有加入中国共产党,他只是以湖南地方激进知识分子、改良派的身份出场,住到宣传也动员群众,组织罢课、罢市、示威游行。1920年11月,张敬尧被迫离开湖南,由北洋政府调任他职。毛先生尝到了组织群众的甜头,也亲身体会到动员底层人民对权力施压的实际效果。因为张敬尧的离开,湖南迎来了短暂的政治真空。新任督军赵恒惕虽然是北洋系,但相对温和,在政治上比较务实。赵恒惕是湖南宁乡人,清朝秀才出生,后来留学去日本学法律,属于早期的开明官僚。辛亥革命之后,他曾在北洋政府体系中做过司法相关工作,还曾担任法官、司法总长的职务。在成为督军之前,他也担任国湖南省长。他属于所谓的北洋系,不是皖系、直系这种军阀核心派,相对次一级,属于本地出身的技术官僚。当时的湖南社会舆论激昂,学生、商界、知识分子普遍希望借“驱张”胜利的东风,推动湖南的地方改革,摆脱中央军阀的控制,实现“湖南自治”。当时很多南方省份都有类似倾向,湖南最激进,毛泽东是这一潮流的积极推动者。

1921年上半年,毛先生在长沙发起并主编了《湘江评论》,提出湖南人治湖南主张。他批评北洋军阀“远在北京,不知湖南疾苦”,主张省内应由人民选举产生省议会,推行地方自治制度。他曾联合杨昌济,也是他当时的岳父、老师,语言学家黎锦熙、谢觉哉等人,提出《湖南省宪草案》初步框架,计划设立省议会、选举知事、独立财政等。这放在现在,可能会被港独、台独一样,被看成湘独。但网络还没出现,水军也没有,cancel culture还不存在。当时,不只是湖南,其他所有省也效法。大家都希望可以相对自治,自行管理,自给自足。这印证了我一直一来的一个想法:中国与其说是“人民共和国”,不如说是“中华人民合省国”,United Provinces of China。从我自己见到的、地域之间的文化差别、各个省市直辖市之间的地头蛇文化来看,各省几乎是相对独立的文化体。不同的观念、喜好、语言、文化、传统,以及省级、市级、区级之间从上至下的层级,平级之间的相对独立,不同区域差别巨大。执法、行政习惯和规矩也完全不同。相比今日中央集权下的省级政府完全听命于中央,当时《湖南省宪草案》中的地方财政、教育自主等条款,其实呈现出一种对‘联邦制’的原始幻想。毛泽东在这段时期尚处于改良派与联省自治思路之间,这与他后来的极端集中主义之间,存在明显断裂。

在1920年9月3日发布的《湖南建设问题的根本问题》,毛先生写到:“大概从前有一种谬论,就是“在今后世界能够争存的国家,必定是大国家。”这种议论的流毒,扩充帝国主义,压抑自国的弱小民族,在争海外殖民地,使半开化未开化之民族,变成完全奴隶,窒其生存向上,而惟使恭顺驯屈于己。最著的例,是英美德法俄奥,他们幸都收了其实没有成功的成功。还有一个,就是中国,连“其实没有成功的成功”,都没收得。收得的是满洲人消灭,蒙人,回人,藏人,奄奄欲死,十八省乱七八糟,造成三个政府,三个国会,二十个以上督军王,巡按使王,总司令王,老百姓天天被人杀死奸死,财产荡空,外债如山,号称共和民国,没有几个懂得“什么是共和”的国民。”我赞同他的这个思路,只是不知道后来的执行为何偏差这么大。我没有办法找到文献细节,似乎现在很多文件不能用非大陆IP访问了。我询问了一下Chatgpt,它根据各种文献推断《湖南省宪法》可能包括如下内容:

  • 省议会制度:所有年满21岁的男子,均有选举权。由基层普选产生省议员,设立湖南省议会。议会拥有制定地方法规、预算、监督行政权力。

  • 知事民选:拟取消北洋政府任命的督军制度,由省民选出“省知事”,知事对议会负责,权力受制于法定程序,设罢免机制,保障民众对地方官员的监督权。

  • 地方财政与教育自治:省内税收自管,不上缴中央军阀;财政预算由省议会审议通过;教育权交由地方主管,自编教材,自定课程,推广白话文教育与实用知识。

  • 省级宪法保障权利:明确列出人民基本权利,如言论、出版、集会、结社;军队必须受民选政府指挥,反对“军人干政”;鼓励工会、学生团体等自治性民间组织参与治理。

当时不少湖南省议员、地方人士在赵恒惕上台后提出了一系列宪政改革建议,比如设置省议会、推动有限普选;推动省级财政独立预算;鼓励地方教育机构自己制定课程,如黎锦熙推动的白话文教学。赵恒惕并未封杀这些议题,甚至曾表示“可先行调研试办”,留出模糊空间。毛泽东、黎锦熙、谢觉哉等人正是在这种“默认默许”的气氛中提出了《湖南省宪草案》的设想。而《湘江评论》从1921年5月创刊,在长沙公开出版,提出“湖南人治湖南”等口号,批评北洋军阀的中央集权。如果赵恒惕当时立刻表态反对,完全可以用“危害国家统一”的罪名查封该刊,但他在早期选择不干预、不查禁,这本身就是一种政治信号。事实上,《湘江评论》直到数月后才被迫停刊,说明赵恒惕一开始是容忍、观望的。赵恒惕在日本学过法律,做过司法总长,对“宪政”“自治”这些概念并不陌生,甚至可能个人内心部分认同,只是他更看重官僚理性与稳定秩序,不希望改革过激。

北京的北洋中央段祺瑞、曹锟等人,本质上是军人集团政府,他们不认同分省立法、民选政府等观念,认为这等于变相联邦制,可能激发地方独立倾向。当时本来就军阀林立、中央羸弱,如果湖南开了自治先例,四川、广东、云南等“本就半独立”的地区就更难控制。他们很快叫停《湘江评论》,命令赵恒惕镇压激进势力,出动驻军震慑长沙,表明“中央不可挑战”。对各类新成立的自治推进团体,如“湖南宪政研究会”“自治促进会”等,赵恒惕开始下令禁止集会,并派军警查封办公地点。许多青年团体、学生组织被“劝退”、登记取消,部分骨干被秘密传讯、威胁驱逐。虽然表面上保留了部分“省议会”“教育改革”的架构,但赵恒惕在关键位置安插亲信绅士、温和派文人,实质上架空了激进派的影响力。对地方教师系统、教材编写团队重新整编,把毛泽东、黎锦熙等人的话语权挤出决策圈。他配合中央政府通电全国,将湖南部分激进派的主张定性为“地方割据”、“扰乱国家统一”。毛泽东等人被贴上“地方激进分子”“鼓吹湘独”的标签,在政治生态中被孤立。运动内部也派系林立,毛代表的激进派与温和改良派、地方绅士派之间缺乏协调,无法形成统一阵线。

当时有毛泽东代表的激进派,以毛泽东、蔡和森、谢觉哉、李维汉等青年知识分子为主,很多是新文化运动背景下成长起来的一代。他们多有留法、留日背景,或受共产国际影响,信奉社会主义、群众动员、社会改造。他们主张坚决废除军阀体制,主张普选、省议会、民选知事;鼓吹底层动员、建立农民组织、工会组织;提倡白话文、扫盲、反封建、打击豪绅地主;鼓励《湘江评论》这种新式舆论平台批判中央。还有温和改良派,或“文化自由派”。主要代表人物有杨昌济、毛先生的妻子杨开慧的父亲,黎锦熙、章士钊、任弼时、何叔衡等。他们大多是教育界人士,倾向于渐进改革、制度建设而非暴力革命。他们主张推行地方自治、议会制度;建立省宪法、普及教育;支持文化启蒙与舆论多元,但不主张群众暴动或阶级斗争。我想如果我生活在那个年代,我应该是这个流派。最后是地方绅士派,由地主、乡绅、旧式读书人、地方商会成员组成,是地方财政、教育、治安的实际控制者。他们主张“稳定为先”,可接受有限改革,但反对群众动员。对激进派提出的农协、工会、动员“无产者”,极度警惕。他们希望用自治打破中央军阀控制,但不想改变地方既得利益结构。但他们保守、投机,墙头草。面对中央施压时迅速倒戈,向北洋靠拢。一旦形势不利,就配合镇压激进分子。毛泽东想的是底层翻天,黎锦熙想的是文化自立,地方士绅想的是去北京不去地主。这三种诉求无法整合成一套统一的制度性行动,最后在赵恒惕和北洋政府的压力下,如同散沙,一碰就垮。


6)联省自治

驱张后的湖南一度成为联省自治浪潮的象征。毛泽东主张湖南人治湖南,不仅是一种地方情绪的表达,更是一种对“脱离军阀-中央体系”的政治实验。但这种自治尝试并没有得到持续的支持。赵恒惕在中央压力下日益保守,毛泽东等激进派被边缘化。1921年底到1922年初,湖南出现数次“整顿秩序”的行动,对农协、学生社团、舆论刊物进行打压。《湘江评论》在1921年8月被查封,标志着地方政治开放空间的收紧。毛泽东在湖南已难有容身之地。1921年7月23日,中国共产党第一次全国代表大会在上海法租界的一栋民居内秘密召开,后因法租界巡捕察觉,会议转移至浙江嘉兴南湖的一艘游船上继续完成。当时的毛泽东,受陈独秀、李大钊思想影响已久,且正逐渐对湖南地方自治的改良路径失望。

在此之前,1919年到1921年间,全国各地涌现出一批马克思主义研究小组,被称为“共产主义小组”。这些组织是中国共产党的前身,起到了播种、酝酿、组织人力和思想准备的作用。最早的小组由李大钊在北京大学组织,上海的组则由陈独秀发起。长沙小组是其中非常重要的一个,由毛泽东实际主导。在长沙共产主义小组工作后,他被推举为湖南代表之一,赴上海参会。整个大会共有13名代表,代表全国50多名共产党员。这就是大名鼎鼎的中共一大。中共第一大的细节不赘述了,相信很多文献都可以查到。主要事件有确立党名为“中国共产党”,明确目标为推翻资产阶级政权,建立无产阶级专政,实现社会主义直至共产主义。还规定了每月缴纳党费,禁止党员参与反革命组织或宗教组织等。

值得一提的是,当时的列席者有马林,是Comintern代表,他提出中共应考虑加入共产国际。Comintern全名Communist International,成立于1919年3月,由列宁发起,总部在苏联莫斯科。目标是推动世界范围内的无产阶级革命,推翻资本主义政权。1943年,斯大林为拉拢西方盟友,在二战期间宣布解散。会议未正式决定是否加入,但实质上接受其指导。后来,陈独秀成为中共总书记,亦由共产国际批准。CCP起初非常微弱,缺乏资源与组织。毛开始频繁往返于上海、长沙、北京之间,试图寻找政治突破口。他一方面在湖南努力保存地方建政的残余力量,另一方面也开始思考更大范围的社会动员方案。1922年,第一次国共合作尚未正式启动,但中共内部已开始讨论渗透国民党的策略。此时的国民党,正在孙中山领导下酝酿重组。为了寻求苏联援助与扩大基层力量,孙中山正在重新考量对共产党、苏联的态度。

国民党北伐了大半年,从夏天发到到冬天,节节胜利。工农运动高涨,共产党力量上升。中共开始没收土地、动员罢工、攻击旧有权威;同时号召工人、农民反抗地主、资本家,并且主张工人农民组织直接管理地方政权。当时毛先生在国民党湖南省支部担任代理宣传部部长。1926年7月,国民革命军由广州出发北伐,节节胜利,湖南、湖北、江西、福建大量地方迅速解放。旧军阀逃跑或投降,地方政权真空,尤其农村地区无人管。同时,各地共产党组织、工会、农会趁势大幅扩张。湖南、江西、广东尤为激进,农民协会、工人罢工团体如雨后春笋。地方没有官、没有兵、没有绅士,但地主还在收租,农民继续被剥削。这时候,谁来组织农民成了巨大的空间。中共在1925年前后就开始在湖南、广东、江西等地建立农民协会。最早的农会多由共产党员、社会主义青年团员、留法回国激进分子推动。他们在农村举办夜校、讲演、演戏、放映幻灯片,宣传反帝反封建、减租减息。一开始是教育启蒙 、 小规模组织农事互助会,后逐步转向斗争型组织。北伐军打到湖南、江西、湖北后,地主出逃,保甲系统瘫痪。中共趁势派出大批干部、农运工作队深入乡村,发动群众组建农会。农会最早在贫苦农民集中、有党员活动的村落建立,然后向周围扩散。各地建立村农会,选举会长、组宣传队、纠察队,印发农会证,发誓团结。

“保甲制度” 是一种把农民分成若干小组,让他们自己管理自己、互相监视、共同担责的制度。“甲”是一种单位,代表10户人家。最基层,称为“一甲”,甲长负责户籍、传达政令、报告可疑人物。而“保”,则是10甲,约100户。保长统管各甲,对官府负责;有时兼征税、抓壮丁、征粮食。还有“总保”,更高一级,大概管理几百户,类似现在的“乡长”,协调多个“保”。甲长、保长往往是地头蛇,比如地方豪绅、地主代理、政府鹰犬。他们有权威、无制衡,勾结官府横征暴敛,多收税、私吞粮。他们会抓所谓的乱民、也会举报共产党、阻止农会、打压下层反抗,是军阀和国民党在乡村维稳、镇压异己的抓手。因为连坐机制,农民不敢反抗、邻里不敢帮忙。保甲制度瘫痪之后到1927年初,湖南省农会会员高达200万,能直接动员的群众超1000万人。许多县市90%的农民都加入了农会。农会开始主动查封地主家产、分配土地、打击宗族、建立农民政权。

在湖南、湖北、江西一些农民运动基础较好的地区,中共组织农会开始查田分地。他们的核心做法包括没收大地主土地,分配给贫苦农民或佃户,没收反革命军阀、土豪劣绅的田地与资产。他们呼吁耕者有其田,反对高租重利。对于没收的土地,中共和农会的处理大致分为三类:土豪地主土地没收分配,对革命军人或支持者土地进行保留或优待。而对中小地主土地,征收部分租税,缴给农会组织,作为农民协会的经费来源。比如购买纸张、粮食、武器、宣传物料等。还用来成立纠察队、农民自卫军,维持地方秩序与对地主镇压。同时,建设农民夜校、扫盲教育等公益事业,设立“贫农救济基金”,帮助赤贫农民度灾渡荒。1927年3月,政变前夕,毛泽东写下《湖南农民运动考察报告》,是他实地走访湖南五县后的总结报告。四月,蒋介石国民党北伐回来,进行了四一二政变。


7)蒋介石

蒋介石,1887年生于浙江奉化溪口,小镇商人家庭,父早亡,靠母亲抚养。1906年入保定陆军预备学堂,后赴日本东京振武学校、陆军士官学校,接受近代军事教育。在日本,他接触到孙中山领导的同盟会,并加入革命阵营。1911年辛亥革命爆发后,蒋先生回国参与光复上海,之后军旅生涯起伏不断。1924年,他被孙中山任命为黄埔军校校长,他在国民党军队的训练系统里逐渐形成自己的亲信部队。黄埔系成为他的权力基础,“党军合一”的原型从此诞生。1926年领导北伐军,迅速攻占湖南、江西、浙江、南京、上海,成为国民党内部最具实权者。蒋先生早年接受的是日本近代军校训练,尤其重视命令服从、纪律整齐、组织效率。他崇尚强人意志与权威控制,而非妥协式政治协商或群众自治。在黄埔军校,他推行的是军官即政治干部的模式,以军事化方式改造政治组织。

黄埔军校,全名“中华民国陆军军官学校”,1924年由孙中山创办,蒋介石任校长,地址设在广州黄埔岛。学校的校训强调“革命、忠诚、牺牲”,比战术更重要的是思想政治训练与对领导者的绝对忠诚。讲政治课的,不是将军,而是共产党人,包括周恩来、恽代英、林伯渠等人曾任政治教官。蒋介石则负责军事纪律、日常训练,并逐步确立其个人权威。在黄埔体系中,一个军官必须具备两个核心素质:军事能力,即指挥、作战、服从命令的能力;和政治忠诚,即必须忠于国民党,具体说,应该是忠于蒋介石。这套思路后来被延续为国民革命军中军官必须是国民党员,高级将领多数出自黄埔,构成“黄埔系”,及军中普遍设有党务指导系统与特务监控机制,确保“思想纯洁”。所谓的“思想纯洁”,主要是指对国民党的意识形态完全认同,即对蒋介石个人权威无条件服从,不能有亲共、自由主义、社会民主、民族主义的杂音,而且必须坚信三民主义。黄埔军校开设政治课,宣传三民主义、蒋的思想、党纲。入党、升职、军校选拔都要审查背景,查有无“思想不纯”之嫌。军中有告密制度,设立特务、情报员,互相监督言论。一旦被认为“思想不纯”,比如对蒋不满、与共产党接触、阅读“非法书刊”,就会被排除、降职、关押,甚至杀害。这和共产党的思想纯洁非常相似,都强调意识形态的统一性,个人对组织的忠诚高于一切。思想不只是内心活动,而是政治立场。

蒋介石的这套模式并没有止步于黄埔,而是从黄埔向整个国民党组织蔓延。党务系统按军队逻辑来布置,上下级垂直领导,没有民主协商。基层组织强调命令、执行、检讨,缺乏自治性。宣传系统仿照军队号令逻辑来设计口号、运动、群众动员。这种军事化政治干部系统一方面确实在短期内提高了执行力、纪律性与组织力,助他统一南方、北伐成功。但它也有很多问题,比如缺乏政治包容性,容不下异议,内斗频繁;阻碍政党制度化发展,党内派系严重、监督机制缺失;一旦军事失败、如内战失利,政党也随之崩溃,因为党本身就是靠军队维系的。这也解释了为什么1949年之后,国民党在台湾虽存,但再也没能恢复政党活力,而是变成了一个脱离社会基础的上层权力集团。

“中央俱乐部”(Central Club)成立于1927年南京,表面是个讨论国家方针政策的青年组织,实质上是一个党内情报、监控、动员与任命系统的隐形网络。这个俱乐部由陈果夫、陈立夫两兄弟创立,是蒋介石最忠实的文官亲信,故称“CC系”。中央俱乐部不是正式的政府机构,但却可以决定谁能入党,谁能升官,谁该被肃清,以及哪种思想可以传播。中央俱乐掌管国民党中央组织部、人事部、教育部等关键部门,任命各级党部负责人,还派遣专员到地方“监督纯洁性”。他们还控制媒体、报纸、出版物,推动“新生活运动”,主张“整洁、礼义、廉耻”四维八德。他们大肆宣传反共、反自由主义、反西方思想。原来用儒家包装极权是从国民党这里过来的。

中央俱乐部的创始人兄弟陈果夫与陈立夫,被称为蒋先生的左右手。陈果夫性格严厉,善于整顿纪律,制定规章,操盘组织系统。而陈立夫善于宣传、文笔好,主抓教育、思想、文化系统。他们精通如何用传统文化术语掩盖现代政治控制术,把对蒋介石的个人崇拜包装成忠孝仁义,把肃清异己包装成整肃党风,把组织垄断包装成统一思想,团结路线。这个俱乐部的人控制国民党的组织部、人事处、教育部、宣传部。他们通过培训、派遣、提拔自己人,并在各省市设中央俱乐部分会,成为地方政权中枢。在教育系统全面推行党化教育,大学教授要听党训,教材要过审,组织大量青年军训营、学生政治讲习所,培育国民党思想干部。而“新生活运动”,则是蒋先生在1934年亲自发起的一场全国性社会改造运动,目标是通过强调传统伦理、生活纪律与道德规范,来整肃社会风气、稳定政权根基。它是国民党面对社会动荡、阶级对立、革命思潮崛起时的保守式应对。

1930年代初,中国正面临共产党革命运动兴起,鼓吹打土豪、分田地;社会风气混乱,吸毒、赌博、性交易、都市无政府化现象普遍;抗日情绪高涨,但民众组织松散,军队士气低落;国民党政权合法性危机,执政效果差、民心不稳。蒋介石在军事上剿共,在文化上就发动了这场由上而下的精神整顿。新生活运动的核心口号有“礼义廉耻,为立国之四维”,“忠孝仁爱信义和平,为做人之八德”。具体要求为衣着整洁、不暴露、不奇装异服;不随地吐痰、不乱扔垃圾、不打麻将赌博;勤俭节约、遵守交通、不走后门不贪污;男女行为检点,反对婚前性行为、通奸、卖淫;反对懒惰、消费主义与个人主义;家庭内主张父权、夫权、孝道、节妇。这样一看,我全部违反了,除了卖淫。这看似是道德宣传,其实是国家试图深入到个人身体与生活的各个层面。当时的执行方式包括首先在军队中执行,每日检衣、查言行。然后扩展到学校,编教材、搞讲座、设新生活会。配合警察系统,在城市设立“新生活检查员”,有人专门纠察穿短裙、打麻将、男女拥抱,强制推行。

虽然“新生活运动”打着传统文化旗号,但它的形式却非常现代,甚至有点像当时欧洲的极右运动。它崇尚秩序、纪律、国家至上,厌恶自由主义与个体主义,强调集体性、牺牲与纯洁,用仪式、口号、服装等方式统一人民意识。我不禁汗颜,我要是活在当时,我得多不纯洁。怪不得我的姑妈说过我没有教养。按照她的眼光,我确实一点教养都没有。虽然我不太理解她如何可以比我更有教养。因为张口就说别人没教养本身,只是因为我把拖鞋摆在还是我家拿过去的跑步机旁边,似乎是也是很没有教养的行为。新生活运动虽然让城市里短时间确实出现过所谓的整齐清洁的表象,但民众普遍感到压抑、厌烦,地下讽刺漫画、段子层出不穷。这也每解决根本问题,贫穷、腐败、压迫、社会不平等。与此形成强烈对比的,是共产党在农村的土地改革、动员群众,政治出现了另外一种可能。


8)秋收起义

1927年,从4月12日的四一二清党,到9月9日的到秋收起义之间这5个月,其实是中共上下最混乱、最痛苦、也最迅速激进化的一段时间。Chatgpt说,我可以把它理解为从幻想统一战线到武装夺权之间的急转弯。1927年4月12日,蒋介石在上海发动清党,屠杀共产党人与左翼组织。随后湖南、武汉、广州等地效仿,工会、农会被取缔,大量基层骨干被捕、被杀。共产党组织体系在城市迅速崩溃,党心大乱。很多人不明白怎么突然就革命失败了,原本是同志,一夜之间就变通缉犯。这段时期最常见的情绪是:惊恐、困惑、焦灼、仇恨。中共党内大分裂,大家不确定,是走还是打?以武汉政府为中心的陈独秀派,主张继续革命统一战线,维持与汪精卫合作,反对马上武装起义。但他被指右倾投降主义,7月被免去总书记职务。而共产国际与周恩来、瞿秋白等人认为必须反击,主张在南方各地发动武装暴动。他们强调枪杆子里面出政权,此时这话还不是毛先生说的,是党内主流逐渐形成。这就是中共从宣传革命转向组织暴动的开端。

7月中旬起,三大起义计划出炉。南昌起义,在8月1日,由周恩来、贺龙、叶挺等人策划,算是中共第一场有军队背景的反击。短暂占领南昌,5天后失败。而秋收起义,则由毛先生泽东牵头,在湘赣边发动农民暴动,目标是攻占长沙。最后是广州起义,12月由张太雷、叶剑英策划,是最后一次大规模城市暴动。所有起义都失败了,但毛先生在失败中拐弯了。他放弃了城市、接受了农村、重新组织了军队。这是他的分水岭。毛先生在上海亲历四一二事件,逃离后回湖南。5月,他以湖南省委名义发表《湖南农民运动考察报告》删节版。6月–7月,他在湘潭、安源等地组织恢复农会,并秘密策划暴动。8月,他奉命组建秋收起义前敌委员会,带队进入湘赣边。9月9日,秋收起义正式爆发。

秋天的雨还没来,湘赣边的空气却已经沉得像一口井。1927年9月9日,秋收起义正式爆发。这是一场被中央批准的战略反攻。表面上它有动员,有指挥系统,有路线图。目标是进军长沙,占领湖南,建立苏维埃。可实际上,这支军队刚刚组建,军心未定,粮弹不继。毛先生泽东是这支队伍的前敌委员会书记,却并不是军头。他是个写过考察报告的政治家,不是领兵打仗的将军。而他带领的,也不是一支真正意义上的军队,而是一群农民、矿工、学生,和几个脱编军官。谁也不知道要打多久、往哪走、凭什么赢。起义爆发于1927年9月9日,恰好是农历八月,即南方农民开始秋收的时期。以农业社会为基础的中国,农时往往与政治动员紧密相关。在乡村进行大规模动员和集结时,以秋收为代号,有掩护性,既像农业组织,也像政治行动。

秋收象征劳动、希望、果实,在政治话语中易于赋予收割旧制度播种新革命之类的象征意义;它和后来的春耕动员冬训整党等词汇一样,具有中共早期政治宣传中的一种农事化叙事逻辑,贴近农民群众语境。在1927年起义当时,并无统一叫秋收起义的正式称谓,当时更多是称湘赣边界暴动湘南暴动攻长沙行动等。秋收起义一词是在毛成功上井冈山、建立根据地后,逐步回顾总结这段历史时确立的说法。它后来成为中共官方党史中的三大起义之一:南昌、秋收、广州,被固定下来。起义的指挥机构是中共中央军事部与共产国际批准的,毛先生泽东被任命为前敌委员会书记。起义的目标是以湘赣边界,即萍乡、浏阳、平江为根据地,攻打长沙,建立政权。

毛先生的队伍是从几个方向临时拼凑的,有平江工农义勇军,是彭公达等人组织的农民武装,有安源矿工赤卫队,是受毛先生影响最深的工人武装。还有原国民革命军的改编部队,是部分军官带兵脱离的结果。最后还有学生、地方激进分子、边缘游民。起义委员会设在文家市,起义计划分三路兵力。东路,由平江开始,彭公达领导,以工农武装为主,目标是攻入长沙北门。西路,从浏阳出发,由毛先生泽东、卢德铭带领,主要队员为安源矿工、脱编军人,目的是攻入长沙东门。而中路,是从萍乡,由袁文才、王佐带领,山区游击队为主,侧击长沙外围。各部队之间无线通讯基本没有,依靠信使传令。毛先生泽东与卢德铭虽名义上指挥全局,但实际只控制自己那一路。农民、矿工、游击队之间训练水平极不一致,行动节奏不一。各地县城和乡镇有警戒,起义前就已泄露风声,被动应战。所以各种通信方式的监控一定是担心混乱的政权会重点关注的事情,telegram的founder也一直被重点观察,微信等更是不在话下。错案冤案有,但正常交流还是不需过度紧张,不要quote我。

起义部队原定9月15日前后会合攻城,结果中路与东路提前暴露,遭湖南军阀王天培部猛烈反扑。东路和平江方向的农民武装行动较早,于9月9日当天就动手。袁文才部因地形复杂、消息不畅,也选择提前出发。由于缺乏无线电通信、统筹协调,结果是各自为战、节奏错乱。毛与卢德铭虽然想等人齐再打,但根本等不到,就已暴露。毛先生、卢德铭虽然试图保持计划的统一部署,但彭公达、袁文才等人在本地早已是红人,动员农会、召集队伍、储备武器时,根本做不到秘密行动。地方反动势力与地主武装早有耳目,起义前就有告密、军警加强戒备。据说,彭公达在平江动员时还公开贴传单、喊口号,等于提前通知敌人我们要造反。

四一二后,地方反动武装已经大清洗过一次农会,起义一开始就被盯死。一些农民组织刚恢复就又要暴动,地方警备队早就安排好等你来打。特别是长沙的王天培部,对几条进军路径有充分准备,甚至埋伏过路线。而毛派系一贯强调打土豪分田地,这对地主、宗族势力是巨大威胁。很多地方主动向长沙报信,称有红军准备造反、农会要武装暴动。加上此前湖南农民运动的激进作风,许多民团提前武装,主动出击。9月15日,卢德铭在战斗中被湖南军队击中头部阵亡。毛先生的主力部队因道路问题被阻于长沙以东,未能及时进入外围阵地。由于兵力分散、武器不足、指挥混乱,整个攻城计划崩溃。9月19日,毛先生在文家市决定退兵。毛先生带队退至湖南浏阳文家市,召开文家市会议,否定继续攻打长沙的命令。他宣布撤离城市路线,向罗霄山脉转移,进入农村山区。毛先生第一次脱离中共中央指令,独立做除了军事政治决策。


9)三大起义

除开秋收起义,和秋收起义一起发生的,还有南昌起义、广州起义,三者一起被称为三大起义。包括后来的百色起义,由邓小平、张云逸领导的,也值得一提。三大起义、包括两年后的百色起义,都是中共武装革命的起点的一部分。1927年,是中国共产党从政治合作转向武装斗争的转折之年。四一二清党后,中共在全国各地策动了几场重要起义,试图从城市与农村两端重建自己的力量。这些起义虽多数失败,但其中的部分残部进入山区,开启了游击战与根据地战略,构成日后红军与苏区的雏形。

南昌起义,发声于1927年8月1日,顾名思义,地点在江西南昌。主将有周恩来、贺龙、叶挺、朱德、刘伯承等,这些人的名字应该如雷贯耳了。长沙现在的贺龙体育馆也是小时候城运会去“翻牌子”的地方,至于翻牌子具体是什么,下次有机会再说。这是中共第一次大规模武装反击清党,也是中国人民解放军的建军纪念日来源。但这次起义并没有完全成功,起义部队短暂占领南昌,后被围剿,被迫南下潮汕。起义准备仓促、内部意见不一。虽然表面上起义由中共中央军事部和共产国际批准,但内部存在明显分歧。包括周恩来、张国焘、李立三等人虽然同意行动,但对是否能成功并无十足信心。原计划8月1日动手,但到了7月31日晚上,才最终确定。连夜调兵,很多基层官兵都不知道发生了什么,只是被临时拉出来执行命令。

起义部队虽然一夜之间控制南昌城,但并未形成牢固的控制体系。地方行政体系、治安系统、后勤供应都未准备,等于是一场“攻城而非建制”的军事爆破。起义后,国民党南京政府立即定性为“叛乱”,调集江西、福建、广东三省军队围剿南昌。其中包括李汉魂、张发奎、韩德勤等国民党军将领,包围之势迅速形成。而南昌地处内陆,不靠近苏联或任何可能的外援渠道。中共在广州、武汉的力量已经崩溃,无法形成声援,而共产国际也未及时调动其他地区协同。8月3日左右,周恩来、朱德等决定“主动撤离”,准备南下至潮汕建立根据地。实际上,所谓“被围剿”不是完全陷入绝境,而是在敌军合围前的战术撤退。但过程中损失惨重,最终潮汕计划也未能成功实施。短暂占领是没用的,需要很多后续、周边的支持系统稳定地区,协调配合。这和拍电影一个意思。起义虽失败,但残部在朱德等人率领下保存下来,为后续井冈山会师奠定基础。

1927年12月11日在广东广州,张太雷、叶剑英、叶挺等领导了广州起义,这是一场城市起义。这也在共产国际直接干预下发起,是一次在城市工人中动员的暴动。红旗插遍广州三天三夜,但因准备不足、孤立无援,迅速被镇压。张太雷牺牲,起义失败。此役标志中共短期内彻底放弃城市中心暴动战略。当时中共内部其实已经对城市起义产生怀疑,尤其在南昌、秋收起义失败后,毛泽东等人已转向农村游击。但共产国际坚持认为“无产阶级革命应在城市完成”,仍试图在广州打一场“革命宣传仗”。起义前夕,张太雷、叶剑英、苏联顾问被紧急派遣至广州,任务是在几天内组织起义,完全是临时拼凑。

起义是在几天时间里秘密策划的,准备极为仓促。主力为工人赤卫队、学生志愿者、部分士兵,总人数不足5000人,且武器简陋。没有统一指挥系统、没有坚固防线,缺乏粮食与弹药储备。当时广州已被蒋介石收复,驻有张发奎、李汉魂、许崇智等国民党军队,兵力远超起义者。中共在全国其他地方已基本失去城市力量,无任何增援可能。起义当天虽然迅速占领大部分城区,但三天内就遭到四面合围,完全无外援。与山区不同,广州是交通枢纽与人口密集城市,便于政府军调兵与监控。城内缺乏群众广泛支持,工人虽有热情,但斗争经验和战斗力远不如正规军。起义第三天即遭猛烈镇压,张太雷被枪杀,叶挺部队四散。广州起义之后,中共内部终于达成共识,彻底放弃城市为中心的起义路线,转向“农村包围城市”。此役象征着“城市中心暴动”的终结,也让毛泽东的农村路线逐步成为主导。张太雷,本名张曾让,江苏常州人,1898年生。他是中共早期最年轻的一批领导人之一,北大毕业,五四运动的积极分子,后来赴苏联留学,是莫斯科东方大学的第一批中国学员。回来之后,就成了“共产国际系统”的人——这在中共早期,是一个非常重要的标签。他是“理论派”,主张城市暴动,是共产国际眼中“可以信任的年轻人”。同时代的毛泽东、周恩来、恽代英,都跟他有交集,但走的路线不同。张太雷选择了留在城市、相信组织、相信革命可以由无产阶级突击来完成。

1927年,中共已经连续遭遇重创。4月“四一二清党”,8月“南昌起义”失败,9月“秋收起义”失败……但共产国际还不肯放弃城市暴动。12月,广州这个国民政府刚刚“收复”的城市,被选为革命下一站。执行人:张太雷,29岁。他奉命南下,与叶剑英、叶挺共同策划广州起义。计划非常匆忙,从接到任务到实际起义,只有几天时间。广州是南方重镇,驻有多个国民党军团,兵力远远超过共产党的赤卫队。但张太雷相信,如果工人动员成功,“红旗能插三天”,就能制造国际舆论,至少是一个姿态。1927年12月11日,凌晨,起义开始。红旗真的插上了广州。张太雷担任“广州苏维埃政府主席”。他还亲自到前线组织防守,据说穿着便衣、背着手枪,躲在民宅里发命令。第三天,12月13日,广州被完全包围。张太雷被击中腹部,在街头流血而死。有说法是他在掩护撤退时中弹,也有说是遭遇伏击时牺牲。他的尸体在街上暴晒三天,无人敢收。这是中共历史上最后一场以“城市为中心”的大规模起义,失败得很彻底。但张太雷的牺牲,却成了后来宣传系统最愿讲述的“英烈故事”:年轻、纯粹、有牺牲、有血书、有烈士气质。我不确定这种烈士气质是不是应该被宣传的,我不赞同枪杆里出政权,虽然我知道很多黑叔叔worship毛先生,但在我看来,如果需要打仗,也许人们还没准备好自然过渡。广州起义是共产国际直接下令促成的典型,但失败暴露出对中国具体国情的无视,也加剧中共内部对“听莫斯科”路线的不满。


10)武装割据

1927年9月19日,先生在湖南浏阳进行了文家市会议。此时,秋收起义失败,长沙未攻下,队伍士气低落。毛先生泽东在文家市召开紧急会议,否定原定继续进攻长沙的命令,主张放弃城市,转向山区。他提出目标,向湘赣边界的罗霄山脉转移,寻求落脚点。这是他第一次违抗中共中央的作战指令。9月20日左右,在转移途中,部队人数锐减,大量逃兵。毛先生不断安抚士兵,鼓励“保存实力”,主张“哪里有根据地,哪里就有希望”。9月29日,队伍抵达抵达井冈山南麓的宁冈。他们落脚在江西边陲宁冈县茅坪地区,与当地一支袁文才领导的农民武装接洽。

袁文才是毛先生在秋收起义失败后转入井冈山时期的重要地方武装领袖,可以说是井冈山根据地最早的实际控制者之一。他的背景非常复杂,既有农民出身的草莽气质,也有一定的军事与地方统治经验。袁文才简介,于1896出生于江西省宁冈县茅坪村,贫苦农民家庭,自幼家境艰难。他早年曾在当地当过猎人,也被迫参加过土匪团伙,也短暂参加过北伐军,有基本军事素养。后来在宁冈一带自立门户,成为地方“绿林”(这个绿林是绿林好汉的意思吗,有点搞笑…)武装首领,控制茅坪、荆竹山等地,实际掌控整个井冈山南麓地区。1927年10月,毛先生率秋收起义残部撤退至宁冈,遇见袁文才和王佐,另一名山地武装领袖。袁最初对毛先生持观望态度,但最终接受毛先生的政治主张,同意共同建立井冈山根据地。毛先生依赖袁的地盘与民众基础,才得以安身立命。袁的部队成为井冈山“工农革命军”的重要组成部分。

1930年初,中共江西省委派人将袁文才和王佐诱杀,理由是他们“骄横跋扈”“不听指挥”“可能投敌”。实际原因极可能与派系斗争、中央对地方军阀式武装的猜忌有关。还是那句话,参与政治需谨慎,人命关天。新闻自由、言论自由、游行自由、执法的公平性、对执法对象的量刑的合理性等等不属于这个范围,我说的是真的打仗。袁死后,毛先生并未公开为其申冤,后来逐渐在党史中淡化其角色,直到近年有部分学者与地方志重新提起他的贡献。袁文才代表了中国革命初期地方武装割据的复杂性。他不是典型的共产党员,但正是这种从土匪,到农民,到革命者的人物,构成了中共早期生存与发展的土壤。前面也说了,有北洋军阀、有无业游民、有农民、有留学生,什么都有。那个年代就是乱七八糟,所以你想想现在也没什么。稳定和和平还是需要维持的,而且很难维持,但前面那些基本自由在和平的国家应该是必须保证的,否则这样的和平有啥意思。现在中国、美国又天天较劲,搞的大家都很焦虑。但总之,没有袁文才的接纳,毛先生很可能难以在井冈山立足。

落脚井冈山地区之后,毛先生与袁文才、王佐达成初步同盟。开始重新整编队伍,提出“工农革命军第一师第一团”的构想。在江西永新的三湾进行整编,提出了一些原则,例如“支部建在连上”“官兵平等”“军队服务群众”。虽然我不知道具体执行的如何,但感觉如果这种自愿打仗的,还不平等,恐怕是更加没人跟着打。能有这么多人加入,可能还是觉得比较没受委屈的,和人离职无非要不是钱少、要不是受了委屈一个意思。

10月下旬,毛先生建立初步根据地,开始武装割据,打土豪分田地,建立群众组织,并开始尝试以井冈山为根据地中心,策应外部,如湘南、赣南的起义与游击活动。“武装割据”是指在一定地理区域内,依靠自己的武装力量,把这块区域从中央政权或敌对势力的控制中“割”出来,建立独立的军事与政治统治,作为根据地。这是毛先生农村包围城市战略的核心概念之一。他们会驻军、设政权,如在井冈山设立“工农革命政府”。并开始驱逐或压制敌对势力,地方官吏、地主武装、白军等。同时,发展本地群众组织,掌握治安、土地、司法、税收等控制权。这不是游击战而已,而是地盘化。以武力为基础,自建政权。而打土豪分田地,是中共发动群众、争取农民支持的根本策略之一。所谓“土豪”,即地主阶级中经济实力强、与官府关系紧密、压迫农民较重者。打土豪,就是剥夺其土地与财产。据说,当时的具体做法包括抄家清算,将土豪的土地、粮食、财物等充公或分配。搞群众斗争会,组织贫苦农民“批斗”地主或富农,有时伴随羞辱、拘押,甚至私刑。同时,分田地给贫农,将土地重新分配,号称“耕者有其田”。同时消灭宗法势力,瓦解族权、祠堂、地主控制的乡村宗教与祭祀系统。

朱德,出生于1886年,四川仪陇,清末秀才出身,早年曾任滇军将领。后赴德国学习军事,回国后与共产国际接触。1927年参与南昌起义,失败后率部南下,转战赣南、湘南。1928年4月与陈毅一道在江西宁冈地区与毛先生会师。会师后,成立工农红军第四军,任总指挥。官方title是中华人民共和国成立后任人民解放军总司令、元帅。参考资料包括《朱德传》《中国共产党简史》《井冈山革命根据地历史资料选编》。陈毅出生于1901年,四川乐至,曾赴法国勤工俭学,回国后加入革命。1927年南昌起义后进入朱德部队,成为政工骨干。与朱德同行,于1928年4月上井冈山,与毛先生会师。新中国成立后历任外交部长、副总理、元帅。有多部传记与文选,如《陈毅诗词集》《陈毅年谱》《陈毅传》。1928年4月28日左右,朱德、陈毅与毛先生率部在宁冈胜利会师,后整编为中国工农红军第四军,朱德为总指挥,毛先生为党代表,正式形成早期中共军事、政治领导双轨体系。

1) Qinyuanchun · Changsha (沁园春·长沙)

The Poem:

Standing alone in the cold autumn, the Xiang River flows north, past the tip of Orange Isle.

I see ten thousand mountains turned red, layers of forests deeply dyed; the broad river is a translucent emerald, a hundred barges strive against the current.

Eagles strike at the vast sky, fish soar in the shallow depths; all creatures under the frosty sky contend for freedom.

Lost in the immensity, I ask the boundless earth: Who rules over the ups and downs of destiny?

I brought a hundred companions to roam here before, recalling the thick, towering years of the past.

We were students then, in the prime of our youth; with a scholar’s idealism, showing our sharpest mettle.

Pointing at the mountains and rivers, our writings stirred the world, treating the powerful lords of those years as mere dust.

Do you remember? Reaching the midstream and striking the water, the waves stayed the speeding boats.

The Commentary:

This poem was written in 1925, when Mao Zedong was 31 years old, at Orange Isle in Changsha. At this time, Mao had just returned to Changsha from Guangzhou, serving as the head of the Kuomintang (KMT) Hunan Provincial Party Headquarters. 1924–1927 was the period of the First United Front—a brief cooperation between the Communist Party and the Kuomintang to "align with Russia, align with the Communists, and assist peasants and workers" to jointly fight Northern Warlords and achieve national unity.

In 1924, the scale of the Communist Party was very small and weak, said to be only at the level of a thousand people; its strength was far from being able to overthrow the Northern Warlords, at most counting as a small detachment. At that time, it is said the Soviet Union suggested the CCP take an "internal cooperation" approach, letting Communists join the KMT as individuals to cooperate and infiltrate from within, pushing leftist politics. The CCP's goal was to overthrow the feudal system, oppose capitalism, and establish a proletarian regime, advocating for land revolution, socialism, and a Soviet-style organizational model.

The KMT in its early days was center-right. Wang Jingwei supported cooperation with the CCP, leaned toward Soviet aid, and supported certain land reforms and labor policies; whereas Chiang Kai-shek rejected the Communists, emphasizing nationalism and centralized military power. He feared the CCP would mobilize "peasant revolts" to destroy social order, relying more on the military, merchants, and the landlord class. As it turned out, everything Chiang Kai-shek feared happened. And the CCP eventually seized military power, and to this day firmly controls land, the military, and occasionally strikes at commerce. They call it "opposing the right," but in the end, they seized all the power of the so-called "rightists" and obtained all the "right-wing powers."

Mao Zedong’s writing is quite good. Back then, Orange Isle was indeed as he described—looking at the banks, the maple leaves really turned the mountains red, with all kinds of birds and fish flying and swimming; it wasn't crowded with tourists like it is now. Reading through the whole piece, you can feel his confusion at the time. Although "pointing at the mountains and rivers" with great ambition, he was uncertain who could "rule the ups and downs." He wasn't even 32 yet—exactly the same age as I am now—and he already wanted to dominate the tides of history. To me, this question is meaningless: no one can dominate the tides of history; everyone is an inevitability in the long river of time.

In my view, his behavior suggests an overestimation of the impact of individual choice on results. No matter what everyone chooses, the result is the same. It isn't a person, an event, or a thing ruling the heavens and earth; it is all events together, piling up into an inevitability. Whether it’s the Communist Party, the Kuomintang, Liang Qichao, or the Hundred Days' Reform. Regardless of the method, there was a need to temporarily abandon some old behavioral norms and social exchange modes that no longer suited society, and try new structures that could drive social development.

2) Mistakes (错误)

The Long March, the famines, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, the "Down to the Countryside" movement, and family planning (One-Child Policy) do not belong in this scope. Any reform, if it reaches the price of sacrificing 20 to 30 million lives, the initiators should reconsider—otherwise, it is a blatant disregard for human life. Any one of these events, taken alone, is a gargantuan disaster for a time of peace. I asked ChatGPT if there were disasters in Chinese history comparable to these; it answered: very few, and listed specific figures for me.

The Long March took place from 1934 to 1936; out of 80,000 Red Army soldiers, fewer than 10,000 survived. An eight-to-one survival rate. As for the Great Leap Forward and the Three Years of Famine, the total deaths were roughly 15 to 45 million. The Cultural Revolution caused direct deaths of about one to two million, but the actual "abnormal death" count is higher. For "Down to the Countryside," the death toll is unknown, but the sacrifice was extremely high. For family planning, "abnormal death" data cannot be calculated, but abortions and the killing of female infants were widespread. Before I was born, I also had an elder sister who was aborted. Because of family planning, I almost didn't make it here to write this article for you; thinking of this makes my hair stand on end.

I insisted on asking ChatGPT which specific events could rival these in terms of casualties. It mentioned the "Poll Tax and Household Reform" in the mid-Yuan Dynasty (14th century), which brought plague and forced migrations, causing large numbers of "Semu" and Han people to be forcibly reassigned and demoted to "mean status." Massive population shifts to the far north and south led to widespread death. ChatGPT evaluated this as "structural tyranny" and discriminatory management based on race and status. Also, the partial implementation of Wang Anshi’s "Green Sprouts Law" in the Northern Song led to mass bankruptcy and sudden deaths among peasants; though not intentional slaughter, the policy was idealistic and detached from reality, causing tragic livelihoods. Certain regions saw sharp population declines due to forced loans and violent collection.

In 1959, China's population was about 660 million. If 30 million died, it means 1 out of every 22 people passed away. The Nazi Holocaust killed about six million Jews, while the Soviet Great Purge and the Holodomor killed about 10 to 15 million. Calculating based on 1,095 days in three years, the Three Years of Famine meant an average of nearly 30,000 deaths per day—meaning the population of an entire county was starved to death every single day. I found out that in the year my mother was born, her village only had about 10,000 people. This directly caused a generational break in many rural areas—an entire generation of people died. Whole villages starved to death, leaving only a few elderly and children who lost their reproductive capacity or lacked the conditions for it.

Siblings eating each other, parents abandoning infants, the elderly taking their own lives—these are not exaggerations, but events that actually happened. The survivors fell silent, like my mother, no longer taking the initiative to talk about the previous generation. Descendants even changed their surnames, fled, and cut ties with their original identities. I only realized that for my generation, if your family still has a genealogy (Zupu), it is a type of privilege—it means your ancestors perfectly avoided all these human tragedies.

At that time, Henan, Anhui, and Sichuan were the hardest-hit areas. These provinces were originally major agricultural and populous provinces, yet because production targets were extremely inflated—constantly claiming "ten thousand catties per mu"—all the grain was handed over to the state, leaving the local areas with nothing. The central government forced grain collection regardless of life or death; even if there was no harvest, the "purchase quota" had to be met, and even the "rations" were hauled away. Originally densely populated, once grain was scarce, deaths occurred by the millions. Meanwhile, "Hukou Walls" were built to prevent "grain-peasants" from escaping the countryside. Many starved to death in their villages, unable to move. In Anhui, specifically Fengyang and Su counties, the death rate was extremely high, exceeding 60% in some areas. Rural areas with populations of nearly 400,000 were left with only 100,000. Some villages disappeared entirely; you can still see traces of "Ownerless Empty Villages" on maps today. Many passed down by word of mouth: "so hungry they ate dirt, gnawed tree bark, and ate human corpses."

Among them, the "Xinyang Incident" was one of the earliest, most severe, and most studied regional disasters of the Great Famine. The death toll was between one and three million, with some townships having whole villages starve to death or leaving only one or two survivors. Local cadres competed for "Red Flags," falsely reporting yields of tens of thousands of catties, but the actual harvest was abysmal. To hand over grain according to the reported yield, even the commoners' seed grain and rations were taken away. Local cadres, fearing "exposure of the problem through starvation," ordered the blockade of villages to prevent fleeing. Tombstone (Yang Jisheng) details the Xinyang Incident and is one of the most systematic sources available. The Temple, The Xinyang Incident: A Painful Historical Lesson, and others also contain many survivor memoirs. It is said internal documents called Xinyang "a severe policy execution disaster to be taken as a warning," yet no officials were ever truly held accountable.

3) Qinyuanchun · Snow (沁园春·雪)

The Poem:

North country scene: A thousand miles sealed in ice, ten thousand miles of whirling snow.

Looking inside and outside the Great Wall, only a vast wilderness remains; up and down the Great River, the torrents are suddenly stilled.

Mountains dance like silver snakes, highlands charge like waxen elephants, vying with the heavens in height.

On a fine day, see the land clad in white, adorned in red—surpassing in beauty.

Such is the beauty of our mountains and rivers, that countless heroes have bowed in homage.

Yet, the Emperors of Qin and Han lacked literary grace; the Sovereigns of Tang and Song were short on poetic soul.

Genghis Khan, the favored son of Heaven for a day, knew only how to bend his bow at the great eagles.

All are gone now. To find truly great men, we must look to the present age.

The Commentary:

Since the last time he wrote Changsha, another 11 years have passed. Mao Zedong was about 42 years old then. Eleven years later, he transformed from a youth writing lyrics by the Xiang River into a historical architect critiquing emperors upon the snowy ground. He no longer sighs about "who rules the ups and downs," but says directly: "Look to the present age." This "look" is control, it is dominance, it is a manifesto.

In the late Qing Dynasty, the government signed many treaties to sell important national industries like railways to foreigners; "Railway Protection Movements" broke out in Sichuan, Hubei, and other places. Meanwhile, southern revolutionaries like Sun Yat-sen had long been secretly planning armed uprisings. There were many Tongmenghui members in the Wuchang New Army; amidst high tension, they decided to launch the uprising early. On the night of October 10, 1911, the New Army Engineering Battalion revolted first, occupying Wuchang. They immediately established the "Hubei Military Government," announced their break from the Qing court, and founded the Republic of China. The success of the uprising quickly inspired all provinces: Sichuan, Hunan, Yunnan, Guangdong, and Fujian declared independence one after another. Within two months, fourteen provinces broke away from Qing control.

The Qing government was panic-stricken and urgently recalled Yuan Shikai, the "Beiyang Minister" and actual holder of military power, to suppress the uprising. But the situation was already out of control; the Beiyang Army had strong combat power but didn't want to die for the Qing court. So in 1912, Sun Yat-sen served as the Provisional President of the newly established Nanjing government, proposing the "Three Principles of the People." But to avoid civil war, Sun Yat-sen decided to compromise, yielding the position to Yuan Shikai on the condition that Puyi abdicated. Remember this decision by Sun Yat-sen. This decision marked the fall of the Qing Dynasty and the end of China's two thousand years of monarchy.

Although the Qing was overthrown, China was not unified. Yuan Shikai led the Beiyang Government, centered in Beijing, controlling the nominal regime. But as mentioned, fourteen provinces had declared independence; they didn't recognize Yuan. Moreover, the Beiyang Government was far from the south and was powerless. The central government couldn't manage the "local snakes." Then, Sun Yat-sen came again, establishing the National Government in Guangzhou, vowing to launch the Northern Expedition. He founded the Whampoa Military Academy, and it was here that Chiang Kai-shek rose from the academy. The KMT also began accepting Soviet aid and started the first cooperation with the CCP; Mao Zedong wrote Qinyuanchun · Changsha. He was "lying low" in the KMT, waiting for his moment.

In 1926, the KMT began the Northern Expedition with Chiang Kai-shek as Commander-in-Chief. After half a year of fighting from summer to winter, they were victorious at every turn; peasant and worker movements surged, and the CCP's strength rose. The CCP began confiscating land, mobilizing strikes, and attacking old authorities; simultaneously, they called on workers and peasants to resist landlords and capitalists, and advocated for worker-peasant organizations to directly manage local power. To the KMT, their "mobilization was too radical," already "threatening social order," showing signs of wanting to seize power. According to ChatGPT, Mao Zedong pushed radical policies in the Hunan peasant movement, enraging the local landlord class. Worker strikes affected the urban economy, causing strong dissatisfaction among KMT right-wingers and the merchant class. I can understand this—after all, it was the KMT doing the fighting; the CCP at the time could at most be considered "external relations." For an external relations team to stir up such a mess, if I were Chiang Kai-shek, I wouldn't cooperate either. But a massacre is something I couldn't do.

Later, Chiang Kai-shek launched the "April 12 Purge," uniting with the military, police, and Shanghai gangs; overnight, a large number of Communists, union members, and leftists were slaughtered. Thousands died within days; the nation's leftists were shocked. The Communist Party went underground and to the countryside, starting an armed struggle. Mao Zedong tried to respond with armed uprisings, launching the Autumn Harvest Uprising, but failed. That was his first time commanding an armed revolt. He was criticized within the party for "opportunism" and gradually marginalized. He realized urban revolts were unsustainable—that was Chiang Kai-shek’s turf, where he knew the police and the gangs. Mao turned to rural guerrilla warfare. In 1927, the Communist Party had about 50,000 members. After the purge, it plummeted to between 10,000 and 15,000.

4) Acting Head of Propaganda for the KMT Hunan Provincial Headquarters

I was curious about what exactly Mr. Mao was responsible for when he was in the Kuomintang, and sure enough, he was the Head of the Propaganda Department—though he was the "Acting" one. This must have been his bread-and-butter work; he could read, write poetry, and write articles, having a great capacity for agitation in spreading "new ideas," making many intellectuals feel deeply understood. Propaganda Head, in modern terms, is the one responsible for propaganda. I think I have some of his genes in my body; I'm so good at this, it turns out I learned it from the elders.

Before this, Mr. Mao was already an active local figure in Hunan. In 1920, he founded the Culture Book Society in a two-story building on Wuyi Road in Changsha. Even now, Wuyi Road is still the center of the old city; although this building is gone, one can imagine the prosperity at the time. This Book Society was called a Culture Society externally, but internally, it was actually a base for revolutionary organizations. I remember seeing in Bodyguards and Assassins long ago how using a publishing house as cover for a revolutionary base was very common at the time; both the CCP and the Revive China Society did it. The Culture Book Society spread Marxist, democratic, and anti-warlord ideas by selling books like New Youth, The Communist Manifesto, Biography of Marx, and History of Socialism. He wrote leaflets, slogans, and pamphlets, gave lectures, and started "commoners' night schools" to teach workers and the poor how to read and write. This is a very good thing, except I am not sure if Mr. Mao really wanted them to be literate so they could make their own judgments, or to make it easier for him to incite revolution. I strongly doubt whether Mr. Mao’s so-called "awakening" was a true awakening. It seems it was just giving himself a reason to overthrow a powerful authority; the goal was still to hold power himself. After all, the promises made before taking power were not kept after the founding of New China, and in "practice," they caused even worse impacts than the warlords.

Many Beiyang warlords were from Anhui, and the ruler of Hunan at the time, Zhang Jingyao, was no exception—a former subordinate of Yuan Shikai and part of the "Anhui clique." Just as there are many factions within the Party now, it was the same before. He served in the Qing Army early on, then joined the Anhui clique leader Duan Qirui, and in 1918 was appointed "Military Governor of Hunan," meaning he was the military commander and supreme local administrative official, with military and political power integrated. Although Zhang Jingyao’s rule only lasted two years, he was notorious locally for repeatedly taxing and seizing grain. He appointed cronies as local bureaucrats, controlled all of Hunan, and suppressed student movements and strikes, not hesitating to open fire. He was an alcoholic and publicly took female students by force. Weak toward outsiders, he succumbed to Japanese economic plunder of Hunan, yet internally treated the area as private property, extorting and plundering.

Mr. Mao wanted to overthrow him and started the "Expel Zhang Movement." Mr. Mao didn't have guns; he knew his capital was the right to speak, the youth, and social influence. He mobilized students, workers, merchants, and teachers, starting to write and distribute a large number of anti-Zhang articles, pamphlets, and leaflets, listing the "Six Crimes of Expelling Zhang": corruption and bribery, oppressing the people, suppressing students, selling out national interests, insulting women, and occupying Hunan without withdrawing troops. These situations still exist now, just with different people, different places, and different methods. Mr. Mao’s propaganda materials were reasoning, but also manufacturing anger and providing a framework of legitimacy. He said this person was no good, but you have to say, what are your specific operational methods? How will you operate? What do you plan to do? Bring out your plan for a national referendum! How is it that it’s still you who has the final say, still "top-down"?

I think this is why every time he launched a "revolution" or a "movement," he always needed to find a justification for himself. He felt this made him different. If a revolution is not spontaneous and natural, but in the form of war, coercion, and violence, I fear that no matter how grand your reason, you haven't helped the people you thought you were helping much. I have had deep feelings about this lately. He has his thoughts, I have mine, and others have theirs. No matter what the thought is—one person, one sentence—discuss it together. "Top-down," or even "indirect election" and "parliamentary systems" are not direct democracy. These "indirect democracies" have quite a bit of wiggle room. With systems so rigged now, many problems can't be solved. To say certain people aren't "occupying the latrine without defecating," I find it hard to believe. This is the same all over the world, not targeting any specific country.

Mr. Mao, during the Northern Expedition, was in the KMT Hunan Provincial Headquarters as the Acting Propaganda Head in his capacity as a Communist. He obtained this position because in 1923, Sun Yat-sen proposed "aligning with Russia, the CCP, and assisting peasants and workers" to start KMT-CCP cooperation. The Soviets pushed CCP members to "join the KMT as individuals," and to strengthen grassroots mobilization, the KMT accepted CCP talents in local party headquarters. At that time, the central government had completely failed; the Beiyang warlord Yuan Shikai controlled Beijing, while local warlords were entrenched, and the common people suffered unspeakably. Sun Yat-sen was conducting the "Constitution Protection Movement" in Guangzhou, but several Northern Expeditions failed; they simply couldn't defeat the Beiyang army. The KMT lacked soldiers, money, and territory, and was deeply divided internally; facing Northern Warlords and foreign powers, they could only adopt the method of uniting with the CCP, Russia, and assisting peasants and workers to strengthen themselves.

In 1917, the Soviet Union was just established and wanted to export revolution; it needed to find allies in the East. Western powers all rejected Sun Yat-sen, considering him a radical anti-order element. The Soviet Union took the initiative to contact the KMT, providing military advisors, training support, and financial aid. Sun Yat-sen planned to use the CCP to drive the grassroots, while the KMT held power—this was the basis of the first KMT-CCP cooperation. Mr. Mao used his influence at the First Normal School to organize joint strikes, parades, and petitions across various Changsha colleges, establishing the "Changsha Student Union" and pulling in the whole province. Not only that, he also won over the Hunan Chamber of Commerce and industrial circles to organize "market strikes," creating local economic pressure. His mass line didn't rely only on the poor, but leveraged the different interest demands of various classes within the unity of contradictions. He sent the petition materials and "Expel Zhang" propaganda of the Hunan people to Beijing, using progressive newspapers like the Republic Daily to spread the current situation in Hunan and pressure the Beiyang government. At that time, the "Anhui" and "Zhili" cliques within Beiyang were fighting; Mr. Mao knew Zhang Jingyao was "Anhui clique," so ruining his reputation would make it convenient for the central government to remove him. Seeing this, I deeply understand the reactionary genes in Mr. Mao; his organizational, propaganda, and mobilization abilities, as well as his ability to manufacture chaos, were very strong. Why is this? Is it the instinct of a Hunanese? I am deeply reflecting.

5) Expelling Warlords

The "Expel Zhang Movement" took place in the summer of 1920; it had only been two years since Zhang Jingyao was appointed Military Governor of Hunan by the Beiyang government in 1918. Mao Zedong had not yet joined the Chinese Communist Party; he appeared only as a local radical intellectual and reformer in Hunan, residing in propaganda and mobilizing the masses, organizing strikes, market closures, and demonstrations. In November 1920, Zhang Jingyao was forced to leave Hunan, reassigned by the Beiyang government. Mr. Mao tasted the sweetness of organizing the masses and personally experienced the actual effect of mobilizing grassroots people to pressure power.

With Zhang Jingyao's departure, Hunan saw a brief political vacuum. The new Military Governor, Zhao Hengti, though from the Beiyang system, was relatively moderate and pragmatically political. Zhao Hengti was from Ningxiang, Hunan, born as a Qing Dynasty Xiucai, later studying law in Japan; he belonged to the early enlightened bureaucracy. After the Xinhai Revolution, he worked in the Beiyang government's judicial system, serving as a judge and Minister of Justice. Before becoming Military Governor, he had also served as the Governor of Hunan Province. He belonged to the so-called Beiyang clique, but wasn't part of the core warlord cliques like Anhui or Zhili; he was a secondary-level technical bureaucrat of local origin.

At that time, public opinion in Hunan was high; students, the merchant class, and intellectuals generally hoped to use the momentum of the "Expel Zhang" victory to push local reforms in Hunan, break free from central warlord control, and achieve "Hunan Autonomy." Many southern provinces had similar tendencies at the time, with Hunan being the most radical, and Mao Zedong was an active promoter of this trend.

In the first half of 1921, Mr. Mao launched and edited the Xiang River Review in Changsha, proposing the idea of "Hunanese ruling Hunan." He criticized the Beiyang warlords as being "far away in Beijing, unaware of Hunan's suffering," and advocated for a provincial assembly elected by the people to implement a local autonomy system. He once joined with Yang Changji—his father-in-law and teacher—linguist Li Jinxi, Xie Juezai, and others to propose the preliminary framework for the Draft Constitution of Hunan Province, planning to establish a provincial assembly, elect a governor, and have independent finances. Today, this might be seen like Hong Kong or Taiwan independence, viewed as "Hunan independence." But the internet hadn't appeared yet, there were no "water armies," and cancel culture didn't exist. At the time, not just Hunan, but all other provinces followed suit. Everyone hoped for relative autonomy, self-management, and self-sufficiency.

This confirms an idea I've long held: China, rather than being a "People's Republic," is more like a "United Provinces of China." From what I've seen of regional cultural differences and the "local snake" culture among various provinces and municipalities, each province is almost a relatively independent cultural entity. Different concepts, preferences, languages, cultures, traditions, and the top-down hierarchy between provincial, municipal, and district levels, with relative independence between peers—different regions vary greatly. Law enforcement, administration habits, and rules are also completely different. Compared to today's provincial governments under central concentration that completely follow central orders, the terms for local financial and educational autonomy in the Draft Constitution of Hunan Province actually represented a primal fantasy of "Federalism." During this period, Mao Zedong was still between a reformer and the "United Provinces Autonomy" mindset, which shows a clear rupture with his later extreme centralism.

In the Fundamental Issue of Hunan Construction Issues published on September 3, 1920, Mr. Mao wrote: "There was once a fallacy that 'in the future world, countries that can survive must be big countries.' This discourse spread poison, expanding imperialism, suppressing one's own weak nations, and competing for overseas colonies, turning semi-civilized and uncivilized nations into complete slaves... English, Americans, Germans, French, Russians, and Austrians all fortunately reaped successes that were actually unsuccessful. There is one more, China, which hasn't even reaped the 'success that was actually unsuccessful.' What has been reaped is the disappearance of Manchus; Mongolians, Hui, and Tibetans are at death's door; the eighteen provinces are a mess, creating three governments, three parliaments, and over twenty 'Warlord Kings,' 'Civil Governor Kings,' and 'Commander-in-Chief Kings.' The common people are killed or raped every day, property is emptied, foreign debt is like a mountain—it is called a Republic, yet few citizens understand 'what a republic is.'" I agree with his logic here, though I don't know why the later execution deviated so much. I can't find document details; it seems many documents can't be accessed from non-mainland IPs now. I asked ChatGPT, and based on various documents, it inferred the Hunan Provincial Constitution might include the following:

  • Provincial Assembly System: Every male over 21 has the right to vote. Provincial assembly members are produced through grassroots general elections, establishing the Hunan Provincial Assembly. The assembly has the power to formulate local regulations, budgets, and supervise administrative power.

  • Popuarly Elected Governor: Proposed to abolish the Military Governor system appointed by the Beiyang government, with the "Provincial Governor" elected by the people. The governor is responsible to the assembly, with power restricted by legal procedures and a recall mechanism to ensure public supervision of local officials.

  • Local Financial and Educational Autonomy: Provincial taxes are self-managed and not handed to central warlords; the financial budget is reviewed and passed by the provincial assembly. Educational power is handed to local authorities, with self-compiled textbooks, self-determined curricula, and the promotion of vernacular (Baihua) education and practical knowledge.

  • Provincial Constitutional Guarantee of Rights: Clearly list basic human rights such as speech, press, assembly, and association. The military must be commanded by the popularly elected government, opposing "military interference in politics." Encourage autonomous civil organizations like unions and student groups to participate in governance.

At that time, many Hunan provincial assembly members and local figures proposed a series of constitutional reform suggestions after Zhao Hengti took power, such as setting up the provincial assembly and pushing limited general elections; promoting independent provincial financial budgets; and encouraging local educational institutions to set their own curricula, such as the vernacular teaching pushed by Li Jinxi. Zhao Hengti did not block these topics and even once stated they "could first be researched on a trial basis," leaving a blurred space. It was in this atmosphere of "tacit approval" that Mao Zedong, Li Jinxi, Xie Juezai, and others proposed the vision for the Draft Constitution of Hunan Province.

The Xiang River Review began publication in May 1921 in Changsha, proposing slogans like "Hunanese ruling Hunan" and criticizing the central concentration of Beiyang warlords. If Zhao Hengti had immediately voiced opposition, he could have completely shut down the publication on charges of "endangering national unity," but in the early stages, he chose not to intervene. In fact, it wasn't until several months later that the Xiang River Review was forced to stop publication, showing that Zhao Hengti was initially tolerant and observant. Zhao Hengti had studied law in Japan and served as Minister of Justice; he was no stranger to concepts like "constitutionalism" and "autonomy," and may even have personally agreed with parts of them; he just valued bureaucratic rationality and stable order more, not wanting reforms to be too radical.

The Beiyang Central leaders in Beijing like Duan Qirui and Cao Kun were essentially a military clique government. They did not agree with provincial legislation or elected governments, viewing them as a disguised federalism that might inspire local independent tendencies. Since warlords were already everywhere and the central government was weak, if Hunan set a precedent for autonomy, areas like Sichuan, Guangdong, and Yunnan—which were already "semi-independent"—would be even harder to control. They quickly shut down the Xiang River Review and ordered Zhao Hengti to suppress radical forces, deploying troops to intimidate Changsha, making it clear that the "Central government cannot be challenged."

Zhao Hengti began banning assemblies for various newly established autonomy-promoting groups, such as the "Hunan Constitutional Research Association" and "Autonomy Promotion Association," and sent military and police to shut down their offices. Many youth groups and student organizations were "persuaded to withdraw" and their registrations canceled, with some core members secretly summoned or threatened with expulsion. Though the superficial structure of "Provincial Assembly" and "Education Reform" was partially retained, Zhao Hengti placed crony gentry and moderate literati in key positions, essentially hollowing out the influence of the radicals. He reorganized the local teacher system and textbook compilation teams, squeezing out the voices of Mao Zedong and Li Jinxi from the decision-making circle. He coordinated with the central government to telegraph the nation, labeling the ideas of some Hunan radicals as "local separatism" and "disturbing national unity." Mao Zedong and others were labeled "local radicals" and "Hunan independence advocates," becoming isolated in the political ecology. The movement was also fractured internally; the radicals represented by Mao lacked coordination with moderate reformers and the local gentry, failing to form a united front.

At that time, there were the Radicals represented by Mao, mainly youth intellectuals like Mao Zedong, Cai Hesen, Xie Juezai, and Li Weihan—a generation grown under the New Culture Movement. Many had backgrounds in France or Japan, or were influenced by the Comintern, believing in socialism, mass mobilization, and social transformation. They insisted on the absolute abolition of the warlord system, advocating for general elections, provincial assemblies, and elected governors; they urged grassroots mobilization and the establishment of peasant and labor unions; they promoted the vernacular, literacy, anti-feudalism, and striking at gentry landlords.

Then there were the Moderate Reformers, or "Cultural Liberals." Major representatives included Yang Changji, Li Jinxi, Zhang Shizhao, Ren Bishi, and He Shuheng. Most were from the educational world, leaning toward gradual reform and institutional building rather than violent revolution. They advocated for local autonomy and parliamentary systems; establishing provincial constitutions and universal education; and supported cultural enlightenment and pluralistic public opinion, but did not advocate for mass revolts or class struggle. I think if I lived in that era, I would belong to this stream.

Finally, there was the Local Gentry, composed of landlords, gentry, old-style scholars, and local chamber members; they were the actual controllers of local finance, education, and security. They advocated for "stability first" and could accept limited reform but opposed mass mobilization. They were extremely wary of the peasant associations, unions, and mobilization of "proletarians" proposed by the radicals. They hoped to use autonomy to break central warlord control but did not want to change the local vested interest structure. However, they were conservative, opportunistic, and "fence-sitters." When facing central pressure, they quickly defected and leaned toward Beiyang. Once the situation was unfavorable, they cooperated in suppressing the radicals. Mao Zedong wanted the bottom to flip the top, Li Jinxi wanted cultural independence, and the local gentry wanted to get rid of Beijing but not the landlords. These three demands could not be integrated into a unified set of institutional actions, and in the end, under the pressure of Zhao Hengti and the Beiyang government, they were like loose sand—collapsing at the first touch.

6) United Province Autonomy (联省自治)

Hunan after "Expelling Zhang" once became a symbol of the United Province Autonomy wave. Mao Zedong's advocacy for "Hunanese ruling Hunan" was not just an expression of local sentiment, but a political experiment in "breaking away from the Warlord-Central system." But this attempt at autonomy did not receive sustained support. Under central pressure, Zhao Hengti became increasingly conservative, and radicals like Mao Zedong were marginalized. From late 1921 to early 1922, several "order rectification" actions took place in Hunan, suppressing peasant associations, student groups, and public opinion journals. The Xiang River Review was shut down in August 1921, marking the tightening of local political space. Mao Zedong could no longer find a place for himself in Hunan.

On July 23, 1921, the First National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party was held secretly in a residence in the Shanghai French Concession; later, because French Concession police noticed, the meeting moved to a cruise boat on South Lake in Jiaxing, Zhejiang, to be completed. Mao Zedong at the time had long been influenced by the thoughts of Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao, and was gradually becoming disappointed with the reformist path of Hunan local autonomy.

Prior to this, between 1919 and 1921, a group of Marxist study groups emerged across the country, known as "Communist Groups." These organizations were the predecessors of the CCP, serving to sow seeds, brew ideas, and organize human resources and thought preparation. The earliest group was organized by Li Dazhao at Peking University, while the Shanghai group was initiated by Chen Duxiu. The Changsha group was a very important one among them, actually led by Mao Zedong. After working in the Changsha Communist group, he was elected as one of the Hunan representatives to attend the meeting in Shanghai. The entire congress had 13 representatives, representing more than 50 Communist Party members nationwide. This is the famous First Congress of the CCP. I won't go into the details of the First Congress; I believe many documents can be found. Major events included establishing the party name as "Chinese Communist Party," defining the goal as overthrowing the bourgeois regime, establishing proletarian dictatorship, and realizing socialism and eventually communism. It also stipulated the monthly payment of party fees and prohibited members from participating in counter-revolutionary or religious organizations.

It is worth mentioning that a person in attendance was Henk Sneevliet (Marlin), a Comintern representative; he proposed that the CCP should consider joining the Communist International. Comintern, full name Communist International, was founded in March 1919 by Lenin, with its headquarters in Moscow. The goal was to push for a worldwide proletarian revolution and overthrow capitalist regimes. In 1943, Stalin announced its dissolution during WWII to win over Western allies. The meeting did not formally decide whether to join, but essentially accepted its guidance. Later, Chen Duxiu became the CCP General Secretary, also approved by the Comintern. The CCP was initially very weak, lacking resources and organization. Mao began frequently traveling between Shanghai, Changsha, and Beijing, trying to find a political breakthrough. On one hand, he worked hard in Hunan to preserve the remnants of local political construction; on the other, he began thinking about a wider range of social mobilization schemes. In 1922, the First United Front had not officially started, but the CCP had already begun discussing strategies to infiltrate the Kuomintang. At this time, the KMT was brewing reorganization under Sun Yat-sen's leadership. To seek Soviet aid and expand grassroots strength, Sun Yat-sen was reconsidering his attitude toward the Communist Party and the Soviet Union.

The KMT's Northern Expedition was victorious for half a year from summer to winter. Peasant and worker movements surged, and the CCP's strength rose. The CCP began confiscating land, mobilizing strikes, and attacking old authorities; simultaneously, they called on workers and peasants to resist landlords and capitalists and advocated for worker-peasant organizations to directly manage local power. At that time, Mr. Mao was serving as the Acting Propaganda Head at the KMT Hunan Provincial branch. In July 1926, the National Revolutionary Army set out from Guangzhou for the Northern Expedition and was victorious at every turn; large areas of Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, and Fujian were quickly liberated. Old warlords fled or surrendered, leaving a political vacuum, especially in rural areas where no one was in charge. Meanwhile, Communist organizations, unions, and peasant associations across the country expanded significantly. Hunan, Jiangxi, and Guangdong were particularly radical, with peasant associations and worker strike groups springing up like mushrooms. There were no officials, no soldiers, and no gentry in local areas, but landlords were still collecting rent, and peasants continued to be exploited. At this time, who would organize the peasants became a huge space.

Around 1925, the CCP started establishing peasant associations in Hunan, Guangdong, and Jiangxi. The earliest peasant associations were mostly pushed by CCP members, Socialist Youth League members, and radical returnees from France. They held night schools, speeches, plays, and slideshows in rural areas, promoting anti-imperialism, anti-feudalism, and rent and interest reduction. It started with educational enlightenment and small-scale agricultural mutual aid societies, then gradually turned toward struggle-oriented organizations. After the Northern Expeditionary Army reached Hunan, Jiangxi, and Hubei, landlords fled, and the Baojia system was paralyzed. The CCP took the opportunity to send large numbers of cadres and peasant movement work teams deep into the countryside, mobilizing the masses to set up peasant associations. Peasant associations were first established in villages with concentrated poor peasants and party member activity, then spread to the surrounding areas. Village peasant associations were established everywhere, electing chairmen, and organizing propaganda teams and pickets, issuing peasant association certificates and swearing unity.

The "Baojia System" is a system that divides peasants into several small groups, letting them manage themselves, monitor each other, and share responsibility. "Jia" is a unit representing 10 households. The most basic level is called "One Jia," where the Jia head is responsible for household registration, conveying government orders, and reporting suspicious figures. Whereas "Bao" is 10 Jias, about 100 households. The Bao head manages all Jias and is responsible to the government; sometimes concurrently handling tax collection, conscripting labor, and seizing grain. There is also "General Bao," a higher level, managing several hundred households, similar to today's "Township Head," coordinating multiple Baos. Jia heads and Bao heads were often local snakes, such as local gentry, landlord agents, or government henchmen. They had authority without checks, colluding with the government for extortion, over-taxing, and embezzling grain. They would catch so-called "chaotic people" and report Communists, stop peasant associations, and suppress lower-class resistance—they were the grip for warlords and the KMT for maintaining stability and suppressing dissidents in the countryside. Because of the collective responsibility mechanism, peasants dared not resist and neighbors dared not help.

After the Baojia system paralyzed, by early 1927, the membership of the Hunan Provincial Peasant Association reached 2 million, with over 10 million people directly mobilizable. In many counties and cities, 90% of peasants had joined the association. Peasant associations began actively seizing landlord property, distributing land, striking at clans, and establishing peasant regimes. In some areas of Hunan, Hubei, and Jiangxi with good peasant movement foundations, CCP-organized peasant associations began checking fields and distributing land. Their core practices included confiscating the land of major landlords and distributing it to poor peasants or tenants, and confiscating the fields and assets of counter-revolutionary warlords and local gentry. They called for "land to the tiller" and opposed high rents and heavy interest. For confiscated land, the CCP and peasant associations' treatment generally fell into three categories: confiscating and distributing land of local tyrant landlords, while retaining or providing preferential treatment for the land of revolutionary soldiers or supporters. As for the land of small and medium landlords, a portion of rent and tax was collected and handed to the peasant association as funding for the organization. For example, to buy paper, grain, weapons, and propaganda materials. It was also used to establish pickets and peasant self-defense forces to maintain local order and suppress landlords. Meanwhile, they built peasant night schools, literacy education, and other public welfare projects, and established "Poor Peasant Relief Funds" to help destitute peasants through disasters and famines. In March 1927, on the eve of the purge, Mao Zedong wrote the Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan, which was a summary report after his field visits to five counties in Hunan. In April, Chiang Kai-shek’s KMT returned from the Northern Expedition and conducted the April 12 Purge.

7) Chiang Kai-shek (蒋介石)

Chiang Kai-shek was born in 1887 in Xikou, Fenghua, Zhejiang, to a small-town merchant family; his father died early, and he was raised by his mother. In 1906, he entered the Baoding Army Preparatory School, then went to Tokyo Zhenwu School and the Imperial Japanese Army Academy, receiving modern military education. In Japan, he came into contact with the Tongmenghui led by Sun Yat-sen and joined the revolutionary camp. After the Xinhai Revolution broke out in 1911, Mr. Chiang returned to participate in the liberation of Shanghai, after which his military career fluctuated. In 1924, he was appointed by Sun Yat-sen as the commandant of the Whampoa Military Academy, where he gradually formed his own inner circle within the KMT military training system. The "Whampoa Clique" became his power base, and the prototype of "integrating the party and the military" was born there. In 1926, he led the Northern Expeditionary Army, quickly capturing Hunan, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Nanjing, and Shanghai, becoming the most powerful figure within the KMT.

Mr. Chiang received modern Japanese military training in his early years, particularly emphasizing obedience to orders, neat discipline, and organizational efficiency. He advocated for strongman will and authoritative control rather than compromise-based political negotiation or mass autonomy. At Whampoa, he implemented a model where officers were political cadres, transforming political organizations in a militarized way.

Whampoa Military Academy, full name "Republic of China Army Military Academy," was founded by Sun Yat-sen in 1924, with Chiang Kai-shek as commandant, located on Whampoa Island in Guangzhou. The school motto emphasized "Revolution, Loyalty, Sacrifice"; more important than tactics were ideological and political training and absolute loyalty to the leader. Those teaching political classes were not generals, but Communists, including Zhou Enlai, Yun Daiying, and Lin Boqu. Chiang Kai-shek was responsible for military discipline and daily training, gradually establishing his personal authority. In the Whampoa system, an officer had to possess two core qualities: military ability—commanding, fighting, and obeying orders; and political loyalty—absolute loyalty to the Kuomintang, or specifically, to Chiang Kai-shek. This logic was later extended: officers in the National Revolutionary Army had to be KMT members, most high-ranking generals came from Whampoa forming the "Whampoa Clique," and a party-affairs guidance system and spy monitoring mechanism were generally established in the military to ensure "ideological purity."

The so-called "ideological purity" mainly referred to complete identification with KMT ideology, namely unconditional obedience to Chiang Kai-shek’s personal authority, without any "noise" of pro-communism, liberalism, social democracy, or nationalism, and a firm belief in the Three Principles of the People. Whampoa Military Academy opened political classes to spread the Three Principles, Chiang's thoughts, and the party program. Background checks were required for joining the party, promotion, and academy selection, to check for any suspicion of "ideological impurity." There was a snitching system in the military, with spies and informants set up to monitor each other's speech. Once considered "ideologically impure"—for example, dissatisfied with Chiang, in contact with the CCP, or reading "illegal publications"—one would be excluded, demoted, imprisoned, or even killed. This is very similar to the Communist Party's ideological purity; both emphasize ideological unity, with personal loyalty to the organization above all else. Thought is not just internal activity, but a political stance.

Chiang Kai-shek’s model didn't stop at Whampoa but spread through the entire KMT organization. The party affairs system was arranged according to military logic, with vertical leadership from top to bottom and no democratic consultation. Grassroots organizations emphasized orders, execution, and reviews, lacking autonomy. The propaganda system was designed following the military command logic for slogans, movements, and mass mobilization. This militarized political cadre system did, on the one hand, improve execution, discipline, and organizational power in the short term, helping him unify the south and succeed in the Northern Expedition. But it had many problems, such as a lack of political inclusiveness, inability to tolerate dissent, and frequent internal strife; it hindered the institutional development of the political party, leading to severe factions and a lack of oversight; once there was a military failure—like losing the civil war—the political party also collapsed, because the party itself was maintained by the military. This also explains why after 1949, although the KMT existed in Taiwan, it never recovered its political vitality but became an upper-level power group detached from its social base.

The "Central Club" (CC) was founded in 1927 in Nanjing, ostensibly a youth organization to discuss national policies, but in reality, an invisible network for party intelligence, monitoring, mobilization, and appointments. This club was founded by the brothers Chen Guofu and Chen Lifu, Chiang Kai-shek's most loyal civilian cronies, thus called the "CC Clique." The Central Club was not a formal government agency, but it could decide who could join the party, who could be promoted, who should be purged, and what kind of thoughts could be spread. The CC Clique controlled key departments like the KMT Central Organization Department, Personnel Department, and Education Department, appointing heads of party branches at all levels, and also sent commissioners to local areas to "monitor purity." They also controlled media, newspapers, and publications, pushing the "New Life Movement," advocating the "Four Anchors and Eight Virtues" like "cleanliness, propriety, justice, and integrity." They heavily publicized anti-communism, anti-liberalism, and anti-Western thoughts. It turns out that using Confucianism to package totalitarianism came from the Kuomintang.

The founders of the CC Clique, Chen Guofu and Chen Lifu, were known as Mr. Chiang’s left and right hands. Chen Guofu had a stern personality, skilled in rectifying discipline, formulating regulations, and managing the organizational system. Chen Lifu was skilled in propaganda and writing, focusing on the education, ideology, and culture systems. They mastered how to use traditional cultural terms to cover modern political control techniques, packaging personal cult toward Chiang Kai-shek as loyalty, filial piety, benevolence, and righteousness; packaging the purging of dissidents as rectifying party style; and packaging organizational monopoly as unifying thought and the solidarity line. People from this club controlled the KMT's organization, personnel, education, and propaganda departments. They promoted their own people through training, dispatching, and promotion, and set up Central Club branches in various provinces and cities, becoming the local power center. They fully implemented "Party-ized Education" in the education system; university professors had to listen to party training, textbooks had to be reviewed, and they organized many youth military camps and student political seminars to cultivate KMT ideological cadres.

The "New Life Movement" was a national social transformation movement personally launched by Mr. Chiang in 1934, with the goal of rectifying social atmosphere and stabilizing the regime's foundation by emphasizing traditional ethics, life discipline, and moral standards. It was the KMT’s conservative response to social unrest, class antagonism, and the rise of revolutionary thought. In the early 1930s, China was facing the rise of the Communist revolutionary movement, advocating for striking at local tyrants and distributing land; the social atmosphere was chaotic, with drug use, gambling, sex trade, and urban anarchy being common; anti-Japanese sentiment was high, but mass organization was loose, and military morale was low; the KMT regime faced a legitimacy crisis, with poor governance and unstable public support. While Chiang Kai-shek was military "suppressing Communists," he launched this top-down spiritual rectification in culture.

The core slogans of the New Life Movement included "Propriety, Justice, Integrity, and Honor are the Four Anchors of the Nation," and "Loyalty, Filial Piety, Benevolence, Love, Sincerity, Justice, Peace, and Harmony are the Eight Virtues of being a person." Specific requirements included dressing neatly, no exposure, and no bizarre clothes; no spitting in public, no littering, and no mahjong or gambling; being diligent and thrifty, following traffic rules, and no bribery or corruption; discreet behavior between men and women, opposing premarital sex, adultery, and prostitution; opposing laziness, consumerism, and individualism; and within the family, advocating patriarchy, husband's authority, filial piety, and chaste women. Looking at it this way, I have violated all of them except for prostitution.

This seems like moral propaganda, but it was actually the state trying to penetrate into every level of individual body and life. The execution methods at the time included first implementing it in the military, with daily clothing checks and monitoring speech. Then it expanded to schools, with compiled textbooks, lectures, and the establishment of New Life associations. Coordinated with the police system, "New Life Inspectors" were established in cities, with people specifically纠察ing those wearing short skirts, playing mahjong, or men and women hugging, forcibly implementing it.

Although the "New Life Movement" raised the banner of traditional culture, its form was very modern, even somewhat similar to the far-right movements in Europe at the time. It worshiped order, discipline, and the supremacy of the state, detested liberalism and individualism, emphasized collectivism, sacrifice, and purity, and used rituals, slogans, and uniforms to unify the people's consciousness. I can't help but feel ashamed; if I lived back then, how "impure" would I be? No wonder my aunt said I have no "upbringing" (Jiaoyang). In her eyes, I indeed have no upbringing at all. Although I don't quite understand how she can be more "brought up" than me. Because simply saying someone has no upbringing—just because I put my slippers next to the treadmill I brought home—seems to be a behavior with very little "upbringing" as well. Although the New Life Movement did briefly bring a superficial "neatness and cleanliness" to cities, the public generally felt oppressed and annoyed, and underground satirical cartoons and jokes emerged endlessly. This also didn't solve fundamental problems—poverty, corruption, oppression, and social inequality. In sharp contrast was the Communist Party's land reform and mass mobilization in the countryside, where another political possibility appeared.

8) Autumn Harvest Uprising (秋收起义)

In 1927, the five months between the April 12 Purge and the September 9 Autumn Harvest Uprising were actually the most chaotic, painful, and rapidly radicalizing period for the CCP. ChatGPT says I can understand it as a sharp turn from the fantasy of a united front to armed seizure of power. On April 12, 1927, Chiang Kai-shek launched the purge in Shanghai, massacring Communists and leftist organizations. Subsequently, Hunan, Wuhan, Guangzhou, and other places followed suit; unions and peasant associations were banned, and many grassroots core members were arrested and killed. The CCP organizational system quickly collapsed in the cities, and party morale was in chaos. Many didn't understand how the revolution failed so suddenly; they were comrades yesterday but became wanted criminals overnight. The most common emotions during this period were: terror, confusion, anxiety, and hatred. There was a major split within the CCP; everyone was uncertain: stay or fight? The Chen Duxiu faction centered in the Wuhan government advocated for continuing the revolutionary united front, maintaining cooperation with Wang Jingwei, and opposed immediate armed uprising. But he was accused of "right-wing capitulationism" and was removed from the post of General Secretary in July. Meanwhile, the Comintern and people like Zhou Enlai and Qu Qiubai believed they must fight back, advocating for armed revolts across the south. They emphasized that "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun"—at this time, it wasn't Mr. Mao who said it, but a consensus gradually forming within the party. This was the beginning of the CCP's shift from propaganda revolution to organizing revolts.

From mid-July, the plans for the Three Great Uprisings were released. The Nanchang Uprising on August 1 was planned by Zhou Enlai, He Long, Ye Ting, and others, considered the CCP's first counter-attack with a military background. They briefly occupied Nanchang but failed 5 days later. The Autumn Harvest Uprising was led by Mr. Mao Zedong, launching a peasant revolt on the Hunan-Jiangxi border with the goal of capturing Changsha. Finally, the Guangzhou Uprising in December was planned by Zhang Tailei and Ye Jianying, the last large-scale urban revolt. All uprisings failed, but Mr. Mao made a turn in his failure. He abandoned the cities, accepted the countryside, and reorganized the military. This was his watershed. Mr. Mao personally experienced the April 12 incident in Shanghai and returned to Hunan after escaping. In May, he published an abridged version of the Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan in the name of the Hunan Provincial Committee. In June-July, he organized the restoration of peasant associations in Xiangtan, Anyuan, and other places, and secretly planned the revolt. In August, he was ordered to establish the Front Committee for the Autumn Harvest Uprising and led the team into the Hunan-Jiangxi border. On September 9, the Autumn Harvest Uprising officially broke out.

The autumn rain had not yet come, but the air on the Hunan-Jiangxi border was already as heavy as a well. On September 9, 1927, the Autumn Harvest Uprising officially broke out. This was a strategic counter-offensive approved by the Central government. Superficially, it had mobilization, a command system, and a roadmap. The goal was to march on Changsha, occupy Hunan, and establish a Soviet. But in reality, this army was just formed, morale was uncertain, and grain and ammunition were not sustained. Mr. Mao Zedong was the secretary of the Front Committee of this team, but he was not a "military head." He was a politician who had written an investigation report, not a general leading a war. And what he led was not an army in the true sense, but a group of peasants, miners, students, and a few off-duty officers. No one knew how long they would fight, where they were going, or how they would win.

The uprising broke out on September 9, 1927, which happened to be the eighth month of the lunar calendar—the time when southern peasants started the autumn harvest. In a China based on an agricultural society, farming seasons were often closely related to political mobilization. When conducting large-scale mobilization and assembly in the countryside, using "Autumn Harvest" as a code name had a protective quality; it looked like an agricultural organization and also a political action. Autumn harvest symbolizes labor, hope, and fruit; in political discourse, it is easily given symbolic meanings like "harvesting the old system and sowing the new revolution." Like later terms such as "Spring Plowing Mobilization" and "Winter Training and Party Rectification," it possessed a farming-style narrative logic in early CCP political propaganda, close to the context of the peasant masses.

In 1927, when the uprising occurred, there was no unified formal title called "Autumn Harvest Uprising"; at the time, it was more commonly called the "Hunan-Jiangxi Border Revolt," "South Hunan Revolt," or "Action to Attack Changsha." The term "Autumn Harvest Uprising" was a phrase established gradually when Mao successfully went up to the Jinggang Mountains and established a base, looking back and summarizing this history. It later became one of the Three Great Uprisings in the CCP’s official party history: Nanchang, Autumn Harvest, and Guangzhou. The command organ of the uprising was approved by the CCP Central Military Department and the Comintern, and Mr. Mao Zedong was appointed as the secretary of the Front Committee. The goal of the uprising was to use the Hunan-Jiangxi border—namely Pingjiang, Liuyang, and Anyuan—as a base to attack Changsha and establish a regime.

Mr. Mao's team was temporarily cobbled together from several directions, including the Pingjiang Worker-Peasant Volunteer Army, a peasant armed force organized by Peng Gongda and others, and the Anyuan Miner Red Guard, the worker armed force most deeply influenced by Mr. Mao. There were also adapted troops from the original National Revolutionary Army, the result of some officers leading their troops to defect. Finally, there were students, local radicals, and marginalized vagrants. The Uprising Committee was set up in Wenjiashi, and the plan was divided into three routes of troops. The East Route, starting from Pingjiang, led by Peng Gongda, mainly worker-peasant armed forces, aiming to enter the North Gate of Changsha. The West Route, starting from Liuyang, led by Mr. Mao Zedong and Lu Deming, mainly composed of Anyuan miners and off-duty soldiers, aiming to enter the East Gate of Changsha. The Middle Route was from Pingxiang, led by Yuan Wencai and Wang Zuo, mainly mountain guerrilla forces, attacking the outskirts of Changsha. Radio communication between units was essentially non-existent, relying on messengers for orders. Although Mr. Mao Zedong and Lu Deming nominally commanded the whole situation, they actually only controlled their own route. The training levels among peasants, miners, and guerrillas were extremely inconsistent, and the pace of action was uneven. Various counties and towns had guards, and word had already leaked before the uprising, leading to a passive response to the battle. Thus, monitoring various communication methods must be something a government worried about chaos would focus on; the founder of Telegram has always been under close observation, let alone WeChat and others. There are wrong and unjust cases, but there's no need for excessive tension regarding normal communication—don't quote me.

The uprising troops were originally scheduled to meet and attack the city around September 15, but the Middle and East routes were exposed early and suffered a violent counter-attack by the Hunan warlord Wang Tianpei’s troops. The peasant armed forces on the East route and toward Pingjiang acted earlier, starting on September 9. Yuan Wencai’s unit, due to complex terrain and poor information, also chose to set out early. Due to the lack of radio communication and overall coordination, the result was each fighting its own battle with disorganized timing. Although Mao and Lu Deming wanted to wait for everyone to be together before fighting, they couldn't wait at all before being exposed. Mr. Mao’s main force was blocked east of Changsha due to road problems and failed to enter the outer positions in time. Due to scattered forces, insufficient weapons, and chaotic command, the entire city-attack plan collapsed. On September 19, Mr. Mao decided to withdraw the troops at Wenjiashi. Mr. Mao led the team to retreat to Wenjiashi in Liuyang, Hunan, and held the Wenjiashi Meeting, rejecting the order to continue attacking Changsha. He announced the abandonment of the urban route and moved toward the Luoxiao Mountains, entering the rural mountainous areas. Mr. Mao for the first time broke away from the CCP Central instructions and independently made a military and political decision.

9) Three Great Uprisings (三大起义)

Aside from the Autumn Harvest Uprising, there were also the Nanchang Uprising and the Guangzhou Uprising, which together are called the Three Great Uprisings. This also includes the later Baise Uprising led by Deng Xiaoping and Zhang Yunyi, which is also worth mentioning. These were part of the starting point of the CCP's armed revolution. 1927 was the turning point for the Chinese Communist Party from political cooperation to armed struggle. After the April 12 Purge, the CCP instigated several important uprisings across the country, trying to rebuild its strength from both cities and rural areas. Although most of these uprisings failed, some remnants entered the mountains, starting the guerrilla warfare and base area strategies that formed the prototype of the later Red Army and Soviet areas.

The Nanchang Uprising occurred on August 1, 1927, in Nanchang, Jiangxi. The main generals included Zhou Enlai, He Long, Ye Ting, Zhu De, and Liu Bocheng—these names should be legendary by now. The He Long Stadium in Changsha was also a place where I went to "flip cards" at the City Games as a kid—as for what "flipping cards" specifically is, I'll say another time. This was the CCP's first large-scale armed counter-attack against the purge, and is also the source of the founding anniversary of the People's Liberation Army. But this uprising was not a complete success; the uprising troops briefly occupied Nanchang, were later surrounded and suppressed, and were forced to move south to Chaoshan. The uprising was prepared in haste, and internal opinions were divided. Although superficially the uprising was approved by the CCP Central Military Department and the Comintern, there were obvious internal disagreements. People like Zhou Enlai, Zhang Guotao, and Li Lisan, though agreeing to act, had no full confidence in success. It was originally planned to act on August 1, but it wasn't until the night of July 31 that it was finally determined. Troops were moved overnight, and many grassroots officers and soldiers didn't know what was happening, only being pulled out temporarily to execute orders.

Although the uprising troops controlled Nanchang overnight, they did not form a solid control system. The local administrative system, security system, and logistical supply were not prepared, making it a military explosion of "attacking a city rather than establishing a system." After the uprising, the KMT Nanjing government immediately defined it as a "rebellion" and mobilized troops from Jiangxi, Fujian, and Guangdong to surround Nanchang. This included KMT generals like Li Hanhun, Zhang Fakui, and Han Deqin; a siege quickly formed. Nanchang was inland, not close to the Soviet Union or any possible external aid channels. The CCP's strength in Guangzhou and Wuhan had collapsed and could not form support, and the Comintern failed to timely mobilize other regions to coordinate. Around August 3, Zhou Enlai, Zhu De, and others decided to "voluntarily withdraw," preparing to move south to Chaoshan to establish a base. In reality, being "surrounded and suppressed" wasn't a total dead end, but a tactical retreat before the enemy's encirclement. But the losses during the process were heavy, and the Chaoshan plan was ultimately not successfully implemented. Brief occupation is useless; many subsequent and peripheral support systems are needed to stabilize the region and coordinate. It's like making a movie. Although the uprising failed, the remnants led by Zhu De and others were preserved, laying the foundation for the later meeting at Jinggang Mountains.

On December 11, 1927, in Guangzhou, Guangdong, Zhang Tailei, Ye Jianying, and Ye Ting led the Guangzhou Uprising, which was an urban uprising. This was also launched under direct Comintern intervention, a mobilization of urban workers. Red flags flew all over Guangzhou for three days and nights, but due to insufficient preparation and isolation, it was quickly suppressed. Zhang Tailei sacrificed his life, and the uprising failed. This battle marked the CCP’s short-term total abandonment of the urban-centered uprising strategy. At that time, there were actually doubts within the CCP about urban uprisings, especially after the failure of the Nanchang and Autumn Harvest uprisings; Mao Zedong and others had already turned to rural guerrilla warfare. But the Comintern insisted that "the proletarian revolution should be completed in the cities," still trying to fight a "revolutionary propaganda battle" in Guangzhou. On the eve of the uprising, Zhang Tailei, Ye Jianying, and Soviet advisors were urgently sent to Guangzhou with the task of organizing the uprising within a few days—it was completely thrown together.

The uprising was secretly planned over just a few days, and preparation was extremely rushed. The main force consisted of worker Red Guards, student volunteers, and some soldiers, totaling fewer than 5,000 people, with crude weapons. There was no unified command system, no solid defense line, and a lack of food and ammunition reserves. At that time, Guangzhou had been recovered by Chiang Kai-shek and was stationed with multiple KMT armies like Zhang Fakui, Li Hanhun, and Xu Chongzhi, with forces far exceeding the rebels. The CCP had basically lost its urban strength in the rest of the country, with no possibility of any reinforcements. Although they quickly occupied most of the city on the day of the uprising, within three days they were surrounded from all sides, with absolutely no external aid. Unlike the mountains, Guangzhou was a transportation hub and a densely populated city, making it easy for the government army to move troops and monitor. There was a lack of widespread support from the masses in the city; although workers had enthusiasm, their fighting experience and combat power were far inferior to the regular army. On the third day of the uprising, it was violently suppressed, Zhang Tailei was shot dead, and Ye Ting’s troops scattered. After the Guangzhou Uprising, the CCP finally reached a consensus to completely abandon the urban-centered uprising route and turn to "surrounding the cities from the countryside." This battle symbolized the end of "urban center revolts" and allowed Mao Zedong's rural route to gradually become dominant.

Zhang Tailei, originally named Zhang Zengrang, from Changzhou, Jiangsu, was born in 1898. He was among the youngest group of early CCP leaders, a Peking University graduate, an active member of the May Fourth Movement, and later studied in the Soviet Union—he was one of the first Chinese students at the Communist University of the Toilers of the East in Moscow. After returning, he became a person of the "Comintern system"—which was a very important label in the early CCP. He was of the "theoretical school," advocating for urban revolts, and was a "trustworthy young man" in the eyes of the Comintern. Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, and Yun Daiying of the same era all had contact with him, but took different routes. Zhang Tailei chose to stay in the city, believe in the organization, and believe that revolution could be completed by a proletarian assault.

In 1927, the CCP had already suffered continuous heavy blows. But the Comintern was still unwilling to give up on urban revolts. In December, Guangzhou, a city the national government had just "recovered," was chosen as the next stop for the revolution. The executor: Zhang Tailei, 29 years old. He was ordered south to plan the Guangzhou Uprising with Ye Jianying and Ye Ting. The plan was very rushed; from receiving the task to the actual uprising was only a few days. Guangzhou was a major southern town with multiple KMT regiments stationed, far outnumbering the Communist Red Guards. But Zhang Tailei believed that if worker mobilization was successful and "the red flag could fly for three days," it could manufacture international public opinion—at least as a posture.

On December 11, 1927, in the early morning, the uprising began. The red flag really flew over Guangzhou. Zhang Tailei served as the "Chairman of the Guangzhou Soviet Government." He even went to the front line to organize defense personally; it is said he wore civilian clothes, carried a pistol, and hid in a residence to issue orders. On the third day, December 13, Guangzhou was completely surrounded. Zhang Tailei was hit in the abdomen and bled to death on the street. Some say he was shot while covering the retreat, others say he was sacrificed in an ambush. His body was exposed to the sun on the street for three days, and no one dared to collect it. This was the last large-scale uprising in CCP history with the "city as center," and it failed completely. But Zhang Tailei's sacrifice became the "hero story" that the propaganda system was most willing to tell: young, pure, sacrificial, with blood letters, and a martyr's aura. I am not sure if this martyr's aura should be promoted; I do not agree with "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun," although I know many Black brothers worship Mr. Mao, but in my view, if war is needed, perhaps people are not yet ready for a natural transition. The Guangzhou Uprising was a typical case directly ordered and facilitated by the Comintern, but the failure exposed the disregard for China's specific national conditions and intensified dissatisfaction within the CCP toward the "listening to Moscow" route.

10) Armed Separatism (武装割据)

On September 19, 1927, Mr. Mao held the Wenjiashi Meeting in Liuyang, Hunan. At this time, the Autumn Harvest Uprising had failed, Changsha was not captured, and troop morale was low. Mr. Mao Zedong held an emergency meeting at Wenjiashi, rejecting the original order to continue attacking Changsha and advocating for abandoning the cities and turning to the mountains. He proposed the goal of transferring toward the Luoxiao Mountains on the Hunan-Jiangxi border to seek a foothold. This was his first time disobeying the military instructions of the CCP Central government. Around September 20, during the transfer, the number of troops plummeted with many deserters. Mr. Mao constantly comforted the soldiers, encouraging them to "preserve strength," advocating that "wherever there is a base area, there is hope." On September 29, the team arrived at Ninggang at the southern foot of the Jinggang Mountains. They settled in the Maoping area of Ninggang County, a border area of Jiangxi, and made contact with a local peasant armed force led by Yuan Wencai.

Yuan Wencai was an important local armed leader during the Jinggang Mountains period after the failure of the Autumn Harvest Uprising; he could be said to be one of the earliest actual controllers of the Jinggang Mountains base. His background was very complex, having both a grassroots peasant temperament and a certain level of military and local governance experience. Born in 1896 in Maoping Village, Ninggang, Jiangxi, to a poor peasant family, his early life was difficult. He had worked as a hunter locally and was forced to join a bandit gang, and also briefly participated in the Northern Expeditionary Army, giving him basic military literacy. Later, he established himself as a "Greenwood" (outlaw hero) armed leader in the Ninggang area, controlling Maoping and Jingzhu Mountain, actually controlling the entire southern foot of the Jinggang Mountains. In October 1927, when Mr. Mao led the remnants of the Autumn Harvest Uprising to Ninggang, he met Yuan Wencai and Wang Zuo, another mountain armed leader. Yuan initially held a wait-and-see attitude toward Mao, but eventually accepted Mao’s political advocacy and agreed to jointly establish the Jinggang Mountains base. Mr. Mao relied on Yuan’s territory and mass base to settle down. Yuan’s troops became an important part of the Jinggang Mountains "Worker-Peasant Revolutionary Army."

In early 1930, the CCP Jiangxi Provincial Committee sent someone to lure and kill Yuan Wencai and Wang Zuo on the grounds that they were "arrogant and domineering," "did not follow orders," and "might defect to the enemy." The actual reason was very likely related to factional struggle and the Central government's suspicion toward local warlord-style armed forces. Again, participating in politics requires caution; human life is at stake. Freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, fairness in law enforcement, and the reasonableness of sentencing for the subjects of law enforcement do not belong in this scope—I'm talking about actual war. After Yuan's death, Mr. Mao did not publicly seek justice for him, and his role was gradually downplayed in party history until recently when some scholars and local chronicles brought up his contributions again. Yuan Wencai represented the complexity of local armed separatism in the early stages of the Chinese revolution. He wasn't a typical Communist, but it was precisely such figures—from bandits to peasants to revolutionaries—who constituted the soil for the CCP's early survival and development. As mentioned before, there were Beiyang warlords, jobless vagrants, peasants, and returned students—everything. That era was a mess, so think about how now is nothing. Stability and peace still need to be maintained, and they are very hard to maintain, but those basic freedoms should be guaranteed in a peaceful country, otherwise, what's the point of such peace. Now China and the US are at each other's throats every day, making everyone very anxious. But in short, without Yuan Wencai's acceptance, Mr. Mao would likely have found it hard to establish a foothold in the Jinggang Mountains.

After settling in the Jinggang Mountains area, Mr. Mao reached a preliminary alliance with Yuan Wencai and Wang Zuo. He began to reorganize the troops, proposing the concept of the "First Regiment of the First Division of the Worker-Peasant Revolutionary Army." He conducted the reorganization at Sanwan in Yongxin, Jiangxi, proposing some principles, such as "establishing party branches at the company level" and "equality between officers and soldiers" and "the military serving the masses." Although I don't know how it was executed specifically, I feel that if one is voluntarily fighting in such a war and still lacks equality, I fear even fewer people would follow. The reason so many joined was likely that they felt they weren't being treated unfairly—leaving a job is nothing more than either too little money or being treated unfairly, it's the same logic.

In late October, Mr. Mao established a preliminary base and began armed separatism, striking at local tyrants and distributing land, establishing mass organizations, and began trying to use the Jinggang Mountains as the center of the base area to coordinate external uprising and guerrilla activities, such as in South Hunan and South Jiangxi. "Armed Separatism" refers to using one's own armed forces in a certain geographical area to "cut" that area out from the control of the central government or hostile forces, establishing independent military and political rule as a base area. This is one of the core concepts of Mr. Mao's strategy of surrounding the cities from the countryside. They would station troops and set up regimes, such as the "Worker-Peasant Revolutionary Government" in the Jinggang Mountains. And they began to expel or suppress hostile forces, like local officials, landlord armed forces, and the White Army. Simultaneously, they developed local mass organizations, grasping control over security, land, justice, and taxes. This wasn't just guerrilla warfare, but "territorialization"—building one's own regime based on military force.

Striking at local tyrants and distributing land was one of the CCP's fundamental strategies for mobilizing the masses and winning peasant support. The so-called "Local Tyrants" (Tuhao) were those in the landlord class with strong economic power, close ties to the government, and heavy oppression of peasants. Striking at local tyrants meant depriving them of their land and property. It is said the specific practices included searching homes and settling accounts, turning the tyrants' land, grain, and property over to the public or distributing them. They held mass struggle meetings, organizing poor peasants to "struggle against" landlords or rich peasants, sometimes accompanied by humiliation, detention, or even lynching. Simultaneously, they distributed land to poor peasants, claiming "land to the tiller." Meanwhile, they eliminated patriarchal forces, dismantling clan power, ancestral halls, and the rural religious and sacrificial systems controlled by landlords.

Zhu De, born in 1886 in Yilong, Sichuan, came from a Qing Dynasty Xiucai background and served as a general in the Yunnan Army in his early years. Later, he went to Germany to study military science and came into contact with the Comintern after returning. In 1927, he participated in the Nanchang Uprising and led his troops south after the failure, moving through South Jiangxi and South Hunan. In April 1928, he and Chen Yi met with Mr. Mao in the Ninggang area of Jiangxi. After the meeting, the Fourth Army of the Worker-Peasant Red Army was established, with him as the Commander-in-Chief. His official title after the founding of the People's Republic of China was Commander-in-Chief of the People's Liberation Army and Marshal. Reference materials include The Biography of Zhu De, A Brief History of the Chinese Communist Party, and Selected Historical Materials of the Jinggang Mountains Revolutionary Base.

Chen Yi, born in 1901 in Lezhi, Sichuan, once went to France for work-study programs and joined the revolution after returning. After the Nanchang Uprising in 1927, he joined Zhu De's troops and became a core political work member. He traveled with Zhu De and went up to the Jinggang Mountains in April 1928 to meet with Mr. Mao. After the founding of New China, he served as Foreign Minister, Vice Premier, and Marshal. There are many biographies and selected works, such as Selected Poems of Chen Yi, Chronicle of Chen Yi, and The Biography of Chen Yi. Around April 28, 1928, Zhu De, Chen Yi, and Mr. Mao led their troops to a victorious meeting at Ninggang, and then reorganized into the Fourth Army of the Chinese Worker-Peasant Red Army, with Zhu De as Commander-in-Chief and Mr. Mao as the Party Representative, formally forming the early dual-track system of CCP military and political leadership.