DATE
6/5/25
TIME
2:53 PM
LOCATION
Oakland, CA
The Three Major Uprisings of 1927
三大起义
9-3: 南昌起义
除开秋收起义,和秋收起义一起发生的,还有南昌起义、广州起义,三者一起被称为三大起义。包括后来的百色起义,由邓小平、张云逸领导的,也值得一提。三大起义、包括两年后的百色起义,都是中共武装革命的起点的一部分。
1927年,是中国共产党从政治合作转向武装斗争的转折之年。四一二清党后,中共在全国各地策动了几场重要起义,试图从城市与农村两端重建自己的力量。这些起义虽多数失败,但其中的部分残部进入山区,开启了游击战与根据地战略,构成日后红军与苏区的雏形。
南昌起义,发声于1927年8月1日,顾名思义,地点在江西南昌。主将有周恩来、贺龙、叶挺、朱德、刘伯承等,这些人的名字应该如雷贯耳了。长沙现在的贺龙体育馆也是小时候城运会去“翻牌子”的地方,至于翻牌子具体是什么,下次有机会再说。这是中共第一次大规模武装反击清党,也是中国人民解放军的建军纪念日来源。但这次起义并没有完全成功,起义部队短暂占领南昌,后被围剿,被迫南下潮汕。
起义准备仓促、内部意见不一。虽然表面上起义由中共中央军事部和共产国际批准,但内部存在明显分歧。包括周恩来、张国焘、李立三等人虽然同意行动,但对是否能成功并无十足信心。原计划8月1日动手,但到了7月31日晚上,才最终确定。连夜调兵,很多基层官兵都不知道发生了什么,只是被临时拉出来执行命令。
起义部队虽然一夜之间控制南昌城,但并未形成牢固的控制体系。地方行政体系、治安系统、后勤供应都未准备,等于是一场“攻城而非建制”的军事爆破。起义后,国民党南京政府立即定性为“叛乱”,调集江西、福建、广东三省军队围剿南昌。其中包括李汉魂、张发奎、韩德勤等国民党军将领,包围之势迅速形成。而南昌地处内陆,不靠近苏联或任何可能的外援渠道。中共在广州、武汉的力量已经崩溃,无法形成声援,而共产国际也未及时调动其他地区协同。
8月3日左右,周恩来、朱德等决定“主动撤离”,准备南下至潮汕建立根据地。实际上,所谓“被围剿”不是完全陷入绝境,而是在敌军合围前的战术撤退。但过程中损失惨重,最终潮汕计划也未能成功实施。短暂占领是没用的,需要很多后续、周边的支持系统稳定地区,协调配合。这和拍电影一个意思。
起义虽失败,但残部在朱德等人率领下保存下来,为后续井冈山会师奠定基础。
9-4: 广州起义
1927年12月11日在广东广州,张太雷、叶剑英、叶挺等领导了广州起义,这是一场城市起义。这也在共产国际直接干预下发起,是一次在城市工人中动员的暴动。红旗插遍广州三天三夜,但因准备不足、孤立无援,迅速被镇压。张太雷牺牲,起义失败。此役标志中共短期内彻底放弃城市中心暴动战略。
当时中共内部其实已经对城市起义产生怀疑,尤其在南昌、秋收起义失败后,毛泽东等人已转向农村游击。但共产国际坚持认为“无产阶级革命应在城市完成”,仍试图在广州打一场“革命宣传仗”。起义前夕,张太雷、叶剑英、苏联顾问被紧急派遣至广州,任务是在几天内组织起义,完全是临时拼凑。
起义是在几天时间里秘密策划的,准备极为仓促。主力为工人赤卫队、学生志愿者、部分士兵,总人数不足5000人,且武器简陋。没有统一指挥系统、没有坚固防线,缺乏粮食与弹药储备。当时广州已被蒋介石收复,驻有张发奎、李汉魂、许崇智等国民党军队,兵力远超起义者。中共在全国其他地方已基本失去城市力量,无任何增援可能。起义当天虽然迅速占领大部分城区,但三天内就遭到四面合围,完全无外援。
与山区不同,广州是交通枢纽与人口密集城市,便于政府军调兵与监控。城内缺乏群众广泛支持,工人虽有热情,但斗争经验和战斗力远不如正规军。起义第三天即遭猛烈镇压,张太雷被枪杀,叶挺部队四散。
广州起义之后,中共内部终于达成共识,彻底放弃城市为中心的起义路线,转向“农村包围城市”。此役象征着“城市中心暴动”的终结,也让毛泽东的农村路线逐步成为主导。
张太雷,本名张曾让,江苏常州人,1898年生。他是中共早期最年轻的一批领导人之一,北大毕业,五四运动的积极分子,后来赴苏联留学,是莫斯科东方大学的第一批中国学员。回来之后,就成了“共产国际系统”的人——这在中共早期,是一个非常重要的标签。
他是“理论派”,主张城市暴动,是共产国际眼中“可以信任的年轻人”。同时代的毛泽东、周恩来、恽代英,都跟他有交集,但走的路线不同。张太雷选择了留在城市、相信组织、相信革命可以由无产阶级突击来完成。
1927年,中共已经连续遭遇重创。4月“四一二清党”,8月“南昌起义”失败,9月“秋收起义”失败……但共产国际还不肯放弃城市暴动。12月,广州这个国民政府刚刚“收复”的城市,被选为革命下一站。执行人:张太雷,29岁。他奉命南下,与叶剑英、叶挺共同策划广州起义。计划非常匆忙,从接到任务到实际起义,只有几天时间。广州是南方重镇,驻有多个国民党军团,兵力远远超过共产党的赤卫队。但张太雷相信,如果工人动员成功,“红旗能插三天”,就能制造国际舆论,至少是一个姿态。
1927年12月11日,凌晨,起义开始。红旗真的插上了广州。张太雷担任“广州苏维埃政府主席”。他还亲自到前线组织防守,据说穿着便衣、背着手枪,躲在民宅里发命令。第三天,12月13日,广州被完全包围。张太雷被击中腹部,在街头流血而死。有说法是他在掩护撤退时中弹,也有说是遭遇伏击时牺牲。他的尸体在街上暴晒三天,无人敢收。
这是中共历史上最后一场以“城市为中心”的大规模起义,失败得很彻底。但张太雷的牺牲,却成了后来宣传系统最愿讲述的“英烈故事”:年轻、纯粹、有牺牲、有血书、有烈士气质。我不确定这种烈士气质是不是应该被宣传的,我不赞同枪杆里出政权,虽然我知道很多黑叔叔worship毛先生,但在我看来,如果需要打仗,也许人们还没准备好自然过渡。
广州起义是共产国际直接下令促成的典型,但失败暴露出对中国具体国情的无视,也加剧中共内部对“听莫斯科”路线的不满。
9-3: The Nanchang Uprising
In addition to the Autumn Harvest Uprising, two other major uprisings took place around the same time: the Nanchang Uprising and the Guangzhou Uprising. These three are collectively referred to as the “Three Major Uprisings.” The Baise Uprising, led later by Deng Xiaoping and Zhang Yunyi, is also worth mentioning. Together, these uprisings marked the beginning of the Chinese Communist Party’s armed revolution.
1927 was a turning point for the CCP, shifting from political cooperation to armed struggle. After the April 12 purge, the Party launched several key uprisings across the country, attempting to rebuild its strength from both urban and rural fronts. Although most of these uprisings failed, some remnants managed to retreat into the mountains, initiating guerrilla warfare and the creation of rural base areas—the early seeds of the Red Army and future Soviet zones.
The Nanchang Uprising broke out on August 1, 1927, in Nanchang, Jiangxi—hence the name. The main commanders included Zhou Enlai, He Long, Ye Ting, Zhu De, and Liu Bocheng—names that should ring loud and clear to most. (The He Long Sports Stadium in Changsha is named after him. I remember going there as a kid during the City Games to “flip name cards,” whatever that really meant—story for another day.) This was the CCP’s first large-scale armed retaliation following the purge and later became the symbolic founding day of the People’s Liberation Army. But the uprising was not a full success. The rebel forces briefly took Nanchang, only to be encircled and forced to retreat south to the Chaozhou-Shantou region.
The preparation was rushed, and internal disagreements ran deep. On the surface, the uprising had the backing of the Central Military Commission and Comintern, but within the Party, opinions varied. Leaders like Zhou Enlai, Zhang Guotao, and Li Lisan agreed to move forward but were far from confident about success. The original plan was to act on August 1, but the final decision wasn’t made until the night of July 31. Troops were redeployed overnight, with many rank-and-file soldiers having no idea what was going on—they were simply ordered to carry out commands.
The forces managed to take Nanchang overnight, but failed to establish any real control. There was no administrative framework, no security system, no logistical support—this was more of a smash-and-grab than any attempt to build new governance. The Nanjing government quickly labeled the uprising as a rebellion and mobilized forces from Jiangxi, Fujian, and Guangdong to encircle the city. Commanders like Li Hanhun, Zhang Fakui, and Han Deqin led a swift response. Nanchang, being an inland city, had no access to Soviet support or any external aid. The Party’s urban bases in Guangzhou and Wuhan had already collapsed, and Comintern failed to coordinate reinforcements from elsewhere.
Around August 3, Zhou Enlai and Zhu De decided on a “voluntary withdrawal,” preparing to move south to establish a new base in Chaozhou. In truth, the so-called “encirclement” was not total disaster, but rather a tactical retreat before the noose tightened. Still, the losses were heavy, and the Chaozhou plan ultimately fell through. A brief occupation was meaningless without follow-up support and coordination—it’s a bit like filmmaking: capturing the scene is one thing, but post-production and distribution are everything.
Though the uprising failed, the surviving troops, under Zhu De and others, would eventually regroup and pave the way for the future convergence at Jinggangshan.
9-4: The Guangzhou Uprising
On December 11, 1927, in Guangzhou, Zhang Tailei, Ye Jianying, and Ye Ting led the Guangzhou Uprising—a city-based insurrection launched under direct orders from the Comintern. It was an urban mobilization of workers. Red flags waved across the city for three days and nights, but due to poor preparation and complete isolation, it was quickly crushed. Zhang Tailei was killed. The uprising failed. This marked the CCP’s decisive break from its short-lived strategy of urban insurrection.
By that time, the CCP already had serious doubts about urban uprisings—especially after the failures in Nanchang and the Autumn Harvest. Mao Zedong had turned to rural guerrilla warfare. But Comintern still insisted that “proletarian revolution must be completed in cities,” and pushed for one more “revolutionary showcase” in Guangzhou. Zhang Tailei, Ye Jianying, and Soviet advisors were urgently dispatched just days before the uprising. Everything was cobbled together at the last minute.
The planning was done in a matter of days. It was incredibly rushed. The main forces were worker militias, student volunteers, and a few scattered soldiers—less than 5,000 in total, poorly armed. There was no unified command, no solid defenses, and almost no food or ammo. Guangzhou had already been taken back by Chiang Kai-shek. The city was garrisoned by Nationalist generals like Zhang Fakui, Li Hanhun, and Xu Chongzhi, with far superior forces. The CCP had lost nearly all urban bases elsewhere—no reinforcements could be expected. On the first day, the rebels managed to seize most of the city, but within three days, they were surrounded with no way out.
Unlike the mountains, Guangzhou was a transport hub with dense population and easy government surveillance. The rebels lacked broad popular support. While the workers had revolutionary zeal, their combat experience was no match for professional troops. On the third day, the uprising was brutally suppressed. Zhang Tailei was shot dead. Ye Ting’s troops scattered.
After Guangzhou, the Party reached internal consensus: abandon urban uprisings and focus on “encircling the cities from the countryside.” This marked the death of the urban insurrection strategy and the rise of Mao’s rural path.
Zhang Tailei—originally Zhang Zengrang—was born in Changzhou, Jiangsu, in 1898. He was one of the youngest early CCP leaders, a Peking University graduate, an active participant in the May Fourth Movement, and later a student at Moscow’s Oriental University, part of the first cohort of Chinese trainees. After returning to China, he became part of the “Comintern faction”—a critical label in the Party’s early days.
He was a “theory man,” a believer in urban revolution, a Comintern favorite. His contemporaries like Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, and Yun Daiying knew him, but took different paths. Zhang stayed in the cities, trusted the organization, and believed revolution could be triggered by the proletariat.
By 1927, the CCP had suffered repeated blows: the April purge, the August Nanchang failure, the September Autumn Harvest failure… but Comintern still clung to the urban uprising model. In December, Guangzhou—just “reclaimed” by the Nationalists—was chosen as the next revolutionary stage. Executor: Zhang Tailei, 29 years old. He was ordered south to plan the uprising with Ye Jianying and Ye Ting. From receiving the order to execution, there were just a few days. Guangzhou was a major southern city, packed with Nationalist troops. Zhang believed if they could raise the red flag for three days, international attention might follow—even if just symbolically.
December 11, 1927, at dawn, the uprising began. The red flag did fly over Guangzhou. Zhang served as “Chairman of the Guangzhou Soviet Government.” He reportedly led defenses in plain clothes with a pistol, issuing orders from inside civilian homes. On the third day, December 13, the city was completely surrounded. Zhang was shot in the abdomen and bled out in the street. Some say he died covering a retreat, others say he was ambushed. His body lay exposed for three days—no one dared retrieve it.
This was the last large-scale, city-centered uprising in CCP history—a complete failure. But Zhang’s death became a favorite story in the Party’s later propaganda: young, pure, sacrificial, with blood-written oaths and martyr spirit. I’m not sure this kind of martyrdom should be celebrated. I don’t believe power should come from the barrel of a gun. I know many folks, even in the West, worship Mao. But in my view, if you still need war to change regimes, maybe society just isn’t ready yet.
The Guangzhou Uprising was a textbook case of Comintern micromanagement. Its failure revealed a deep ignorance of China’s real conditions—and pushed the CCP to rethink its loyalty to Moscow.