Created on
Updated on
Filmmaking in the Age of AI(9): Screenwriting Is Not Typically a High Paying Job
Fifty Shades of Screenwriting

Preface: Re-teaching myself the new filmmaking pipeline, now with AI (netflix please notice me). co-written with Claude. NOW WITH AUDIO.
The journey from blank page to finished film is one of the most complex and variable processes in any creative industry. No two productions follow exactly the same path, but certain patterns are consistent enough to describe. First, there's the original spec scripts — written by a writer on their own initiative, without commission — are the traditional entry point for new writers and the purest expression of individual creative vision. A writer develops an idea, writes the script, and then attempts to sell it or use it to attract representation and work. The spec script market is considerably less lucrative than it was in the early 1990s gold rush — seven-figure spec sales are now rare — but the spec script remains the primary calling card for emerging writers. There are commissioned original scripts — a producer or studio has an idea and hires a writer to develop it. The writer is paid for their work whether or not the film is made. This is more financially secure than writing on spec but involves working within a framework defined by someone else from the beginning. Adaptations — the majority of films produced by major studios today are adaptations of existing source material. Novels, comic books, true stories, video games, existing films from other countries, old television shows, theme park rides — anything with existing name recognition and proven audience appeal is potential adaptation material. The writer is hired to translate source material into screenplay form, working with the original work's strengths and limitations. IP development — studios and streaming platforms maintain enormous libraries of intellectual property — existing franchises, characters, and universes — and hire writers to develop new stories within those established frameworks. A writer hired to write a new Marvel film or a new entry in an existing franchise is working within some of the tightest creative constraints in the industry.
Before a script is written — or sometimes before a finished spec script is submitted — a pitch is made. This is a meeting, usually brief, in which a writer or producer presents a story idea to studio executives or development executives in the hope of getting a commission or a deal. The pitch is one of the most peculiar and demanding skills in the industry — a completely different capability from the ability to write. A good pitch is part storytelling, part salesmanship, part performance. The writer must convey not just the plot but the tone, the theme, the emotional experience of a film that does not yet exist, in a meeting that might last twenty minutes. Writers who are brilliant on the page are sometimes terrible in the room, and vice versa. The disconnect between pitching ability and writing ability has shaped Hollywood development culture in ways that are not always artistically productive — compelling pitches sometimes produce mediocre films while compelling scripts sometimes never get made because their writers couldn't sell them in a meeting.
Once a script is commissioned or purchased, it enters development — arguably the most chaotic and most misunderstood phase of the filmmaking process. Development is the period during which the script is worked on before production begins. It can last months or years — or decades, in extreme cases. Films that spend years or decades in development without ever getting made are said to be in development hell, and development hell is one of the most consistent features of the Hollywood landscape. The development process involves multiple rounds of notes and revisions from multiple sources simultaneously — the producer, the studio or streaming platform's development executives, potentially the director if one is attached, potentially star actors whose participation the production needs. Each of these parties has legitimate creative interests and also institutional interests — protecting their investment, managing risk, appealing to the broadest possible audience — that may or may not align with the script's artistic integrity. The writer must navigate these competing voices while maintaining the coherence and vision of the work. This is genuinely difficult even for the most experienced writers, and the development process is where the most creative damage tends to be done to scripts — not through malice but through the accumulation of well-intentioned notes that gradually erode whatever was distinctive about the original material.
How much do screenwriters get paid? This is one of the most variable questions in the industry, with answers ranging from nothing — for writers working on spec — to millions of dollars for established writers on major productions. There are WGA minimum rates establish the floor below which guild members cannot be paid. As of the 2023 contract, WGA minimums for a feature film screenplay range from approximately $80,000 to $140,000 depending on the budget of the production — lower budget films pay less, higher budget films pay more. These are minimums, not typical rates. Established writers command considerably more. WGA rates — formally called Minimum Basic Agreement rates or MBA rates — are the absolute minimum amounts that any WGA signatory company must pay a writer for covered work. They are not typical rates or average rates. They are the floor below which no guild member can legally be paid by a company that has signed the WGA's collective bargaining agreement. Think of them the way you would think of minimum wage — except considerably more complex, because the rates vary depending on an enormous number of factors: the type of work, the budget of the production, the medium, the length of the material, and whether it is an original work or an adaptation. The rates are renegotiated periodically — typically every three years — through collective bargaining between the WGA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, known as the AMPTP, which represents the major studios and streaming platforms. WGA rates apply only to work done for WGA signatory companies — companies that have signed the WGA's Minimum Basic Agreement and agreed to abide by its terms. The major Hollywood studios — Warner Bros., Universal, Paramount, Disney, Sony, Netflix, Amazon, Apple TV+, and their subsidiaries — are all WGA signatories. Independent productions, smaller streaming platforms, and non-American productions may or may not be WGA signatories. A WGA member who takes work from a non-signatory company does so in violation of guild rules and risks disciplinary action — though enforcement varies considerably in practice.
An original screenplay is one not based on pre-existing source material — a story and script created entirely by the writer. For a high budget film — budget above $5 million — the WGA minimum for an original screenplay as of the 2023 contract is approximately $141,000 for the complete package of story and screenplay. This covers the writer delivering a treatment or outline followed by a complete first draft script. For a low budget film — budget below $5 million — the minimum drops to approximately $48,000(!!!) for the complete original screenplay package. These numbers sound substantial but need to be understood in context. Writing a feature screenplay typically takes several months to a year of sustained work. At $141,000 over nine months, a writer is earning approximately $15,000 a month — comfortable but not extraordinary for a skilled professional in Los Angeles or New York, cities with very high costs of living. And this assumes the writer is continuously employed, which many are not.
An adaptation is a screenplay based on existing source material — a novel, a true story, a comic book, another film. The rates for adaptations are slightly lower than for original screenplays because the writer is working from an existing foundation rather than generating all material from scratch. High budget adaptation minimum: approximately $106,000. Low budget adaptation minimum: approximately $36,000. Before a full screenplay is written, a writer may be hired to produce a treatment — a detailed prose description of the story, typically ranging from a few pages to thirty or forty pages — or a story — a shorter outline of the narrative. These are paid separately from the screenplay itself. High budget treatment minimum: approximately $26,000. Low budget treatment minimum: approximately $9,000. When a writer is hired to rewrite an existing script rather than write an original screenplay, different rates apply. A rewrite — a substantial revision of an existing script — commands a minimum of approximately $40,000 for a high budget film, $14,000 for a low budget film. A polish — a lighter revision, tightening and improving without substantially restructuring — commands a minimum of approximately $20,000 for a high budget film, $7,000 for a low budget film. These rates are per draft. A writer hired to do a rewrite and then a polish would be entitled to both fees separately.
Television rates are considerably more complex than feature film rates because they vary across multiple dimensions simultaneously — the length of the episode, the type of network or platform, the specific role of the writer, and whether the writer is working as a writer-producer. The basic unit of television writing compensation is the per episode fee — what a writer is paid for writing a single episode of a series. These rates vary by episode length and platform type. The WGA distinguishes between network television — the traditional broadcast networks like ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox — pay television — HBO, Showtime, and similar premium cable channels — and streaming — Netflix, Amazon, Apple TV+, Disney+, and similar platforms. For a one-hour episode on a major network or streaming platform, current WGA minimums run approximately:
Staff writer: approximately $4,500 per week on a guaranteed minimum employment period. Staff writers are typically guaranteed a minimum number of weeks of employment — usually around 20 weeks for a network series, though this varies. Story editor: approximately $5,200 per week.
Executive story editor: approximately $6,000 per week.
Co-producer: approximately $8,500 per week.
Producer: approximately $10,500 per week.
Supervising producer: approximately $13,500 per week.
Co-executive producer: approximately $17,000 per week.
Executive producer / showrunner: negotiated individually, not covered by WGA minimums, can range from $30,000 to $100,000 per week or more for established showrunners on major productions.
For a half-hour episode — the standard length for sitcoms and comedy series — the per episode fees are lower, roughly 60 to 70 percent of the one-hour rates.
One important complexity of television compensation is the separation of functions — the WGA rule that distinguishes between a writer's compensation for writing services and their compensation for producing services. A writer-producer on a television series is performing two distinct functions — writing scripts and producing episodes. The WGA's separation of functions provisions require that these be compensated separately. A writer who is also a producer must be paid their writing fee for any scripts they write in addition to their producing fee. Studios cannot combine the two into a single payment that effectively reduces the writing compensation below minimum rates. This distinction sounds technical but matters enormously in practice — it is one of the ways studios have historically tried to reduce their actual writing costs while nominally complying with WGA minimums.
Residuals are perhaps the most important and most complex component of WGA compensation — and the area where the conflict between the guild and the studios has been most intense in recent years. A residual is a payment made to a writer — and other guild members — each time their work is reused in a way beyond its initial exhibition. When a film is broadcast on television, released on DVD, shown on an airplane, or streamed on a platform, the writer receives a residual payment. When a television episode is rerun, syndicated to a local station, or made available on a streaming platform, the writer receives a residual. Residuals were established by the WGA in the 1950s on the principle that when a writer's work generates additional revenue beyond its initial release, the writer should share in that revenue. A film that has been generating rental income for twenty years is still making money from the writer's work — the writer should still be compensated for that ongoing use. Residuals are not large payments individually. A single residual check for a network television rerun might be $50 to $200. But they accumulate. A writer who has worked steadily in television for fifteen years, with credits on shows that continue to be broadcast and sold internationally, might receive $20,000 to $50,000 or more per year in residual income — money that continues to arrive whether or not they are currently employed on a new project. This ongoing income is economically crucial for working writers. It provides financial stability between jobs, makes it possible to take time to develop new projects, and sustains the middle class of the profession — the working writers who are not showrunners or script doctors but who make solid careers over many years.
Traditional network television residuals were calculated as a percentage of the license fee — the amount a network paid the studio for the right to broadcast an episode. Each time an episode was rebroadcast, the writer received a percentage of the original license fee. Streaming platforms disrupted this model in two ways. First, streaming platforms typically do not license content from studios in the traditional sense — they either produce content themselves or acquire it outright. There is no license fee to calculate a percentage of. Second, streaming platforms do not rebroadcast in the traditional sense — content is simply available in a library that subscribers access whenever they choose. There is no specific rerun event that triggers a residual payment in the traditional way. The streaming residual formula that existed before the 2023 strike was based on the number of subscribers a platform had — a fixed payment per episode determined by the platform's subscriber count, paid once, regardless of how many times the content was actually watched. This formula produced dramatically lower residual income than traditional television for most writers, even on enormously successful shows.vA writer whose episode of a network drama was rerun fifty times over ten years might receive $10,000 to $20,000 in cumulative residuals for that one episode. A writer whose episode of a hit Netflix series was watched by fifty million people might receive a one-time streaming residual payment of $300 to $500 for the same episode.vThis disparity — between the enormous commercial value of streaming content and the minimal residual compensation writers received for creating it — was the central economic grievance driving the 2023 strike. More on this in the next post. ☀️